Skip to main content

Fate and long-lasting therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stromal/stem-like cells: mechanistic insights

Abstract

A large body of evidence suggests that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are able to respond rapidly to the cytokine milieu following systemic infusion. This encounter has the potential to dictate their therapeutic efficacy (also referred to as licensing). MSCs are able to rapidly react to cellular damage by migrating to the inflamed tissue and ultimately modifying the inflammatory microenvironment. However, the limited use of MSCs in clinical practice can be attributed to a lack of understanding of the fate of MSCs in patients after administration and long term MSC-derived therapeutic activity. While the known physiological effectors of viable MSCs make a relative contribution, an innate property of MSCs as a therapeutic agent is their caspase-dependent cell death. These mechanisms may be involving the functional reprogramming of myeloid phagocytes via efferocytosis, the process by which apoptotic bodies (ABs) are identified for engulfment by both specialized and non-specialized phagocytic cells. Recent studies have provided evidence that the uptake of ABs with a distinct genetic component can induce changes in gene expression through the process of epigenetic remodeling. This phenomenon, known as ‘trained immunity’, has a significant impact on immunometabolism processes. It is hypothesized that the diversity of recipient cells within the inflammatory stroma adjacent to MSCs may potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting the clinical outcome of MSC treatment, while also contributing to the variable outcomes observed with MSC-based therapies. Therefore, the long-term reconstructive process of MSCs may potentially be mediated by MSC apoptosis and subsequent phagocyte-mediated efferocytosis.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

A multipotent and self-renewing population of spindle-shaped progenitor cells that can be isolated from various tissues and are capable of giving rise to multiple cell lineages under the appropriate differentiation media are known as marrow stromal cells or mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) [1, 2]. Their unique properties, including regenerative capacity, immunomodulatory activity and relatively non-immunogenic nature, have made MSC-based immunotherapy a promising novel therapeutic intervention in many areas, including hematological disorders, organ transplantation, tissue engineering, neurodegenerative diseases and conditions requiring immune system restoration [3,4,5,6]. MSCs have been extensively studied in various research endeavors within the field of managing pathological states. A major focus has been directed towards reducing inflammatory processes [7]. The verification of the safety of infusing culture-expanded allogeneic MSCs has been confirmed in the majority of clinical studies. However, the efficacy is reliant on various factors including the quantity of cells administered, the choice of MSCs donor, cell-passage number, the method of transplantation, and other associated variables [8]. Besides their potential to differentiate into multiple cell lineages (including osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondrocytes), MSCs have shown the ability to acquire adaptive properties to direct the functional fate of the cells, a phenomenon termed “trained immunity” [9].

It must be pointed out that trained immunity could be introduced as a nonspecific adaptive characteristic (functional reprogramming) in innate immune cells such as monocytes [10, 11], neutrophils [12], and macrophages [13]. Trained immunity is mediated by extensive metabolic and precise changes in chromatin structure facilitated by histone modification (epigenetic remodeling) [9, 14,15,16,17], resulting in enhancement/reduction in immune responses [18, 19]. Initially, trained immunity was believed to operate through mature myeloid cells. This posed a puzzle, as fully developed myeloid cells, including monocytes and dendritic cells (DCs), along with various receptors, can facilitate the initiation of trained immunity [9]. Trained immunity may manifest in bone marrow progenitor cells, known as central trained immunity [20, 21], and in blood monocytes and tissue macrophages (MQs), referred to as peripheral trained immunity. This phenomenon can persist in myeloid cells for extended periods, ranging from several months to years, and in some instances, even decades [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. As indicated in monocytes functional fate, trained immunity may represent either enhanced or refractory innate immune status (tolerance), depending on various factors such as the type and concentration of targets they encounter [9, 25, 32, 33]. Ifrim et al. have revealed that the differential engagement of pattern recognition receptors (which are context-dependent) could decide the functional reprogramming of monocytes [9]. Accordingly, trained immunity has been suggested as an important new approach to improve current vaccines or to develop novel vaccines which lead to an augmented immune response [34]. However, various stimuli may lead to varied trained immunity of innate immune cells that have potential implications in improving phagocytosis of myeloid cells [35, 36] or homeostasis [37,38,39].

It is important to note that the outcome of MSCs transplantation is influenced by matrix-derived signals, particularly depending on the type and concentration of inflammatory cytokines they are exposed to [40]. In addition, MSCs might also exhibit distinct differentiation characteristics in reaction to stimuli or cues within their stroma, resulting in epigenetic modifications and phenotypic alterations in MSCs [41]. This effect is evidenced by the reprogramming of their responses towards either immunogenic or tolerogenic phenotypes, two distinct and opposing functional pathways [40]. By analyzing the impact of the cytokine milieu on MSCs, current knowledge has suggested a link between the downstream activation of specific intracellular signaling cascades and their participation in acquired immunomodulatory functions. For example, MSCs primed with interleukin-1β (IL-1β) exhibit immunosuppressive activation through the nuclear factor kappa β (NF-κβ) pathway [42, 43]. Meanwhile, MSCs exposed to interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) show activation of the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathways [44], leading to the generation of various molecules responsible for orchestrating the immunomodulatory role of MSCs [45, 46]. Moreover, stimulation of toll-like receptor-3 (TLR-3) or TLR-4 has been found to potentially activate the immunosuppressive capacity of MSCs through the involvement of the Notch and NF-κβ pathways, respectively [47]. Therefore, the response to the surrounding stroma is the first step before the interaction between MSCs and their target cells.

Contact-dependent mechanisms involving intercellular interactions mediated by surface molecules, as well as the production of soluble components and subcellular particles, are thought to be the main mode of action of the short-lived immunomodulation mediated by MSCs [48]. Several biomarkers have been shown to be involved in MSC-mediated immunoregulation, some of which are produced constitutively (e.g., transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)), while others are released following MSC exposure to target cells or the matrix-derived cues (e.g., indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and nitric oxide (NO)). MSCs display the presence of diverse cell surface proteins, including TLRs, ATPases, nucleosidases, receptors implicated in differentiation pathways, as well as molecules possessing immune regulatory capabilities, such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Fas ligand (FasL). By means of distinct surface proteins, MSCs are able to directly interact with immune cells including monocytes and modulate their functionality [49,50,51]. We have conducted a comprehensive analysis and documented the almost exhaustive short-term therapeutic properties of MSCs [52, 53]. Based on extensive pre-existing data, the paracrine capacity of MSCs is also influenced by various positive feedback and autoregulatory loops. MSCs may not have enough time to secrete a sufficient quantity of immunomodulatory factors to exert their effects over long distances, given their limited half-life [48]. Therefore, the hypothesis that the therapeutic activity of MSCs is mediated by their secretome is challenged by the relatively short lifespan of MSCs following intravenous infusion. However, there is evidence to support the concept that certain molecular mechanisms responsible for the therapeutically important immunomodulatory effects of MSCs are mediated or enhanced by direct or close communication with immunocytes [54, 55]. Recently, there is increasing evidence that MSCs possess an additional mechanism responsible for exerting a potent immunomodulatory effect on both innate and adaptive immune cells [7].

Emerging research suggests that exogenous MSCs undergo apoptosis after administration. This process is thought to represent a novel mechanism that contributes significantly to the therapeutic benefits of MSC therapy [48, 56,57,58,59,60]. The elimination of apoptotic cells by phagocytes, both professional and non-professional, referred to as “efferocytosis,” is crucial in maintaining tissue homeostasis. The interconnection between efferocytosis and the resolution of inflammation in both healthy and pathological conditions, as well as in the regeneration of organs and immune responses, has been well-documented. Efferocytosis exhibits morphological and mechanistic differences compared to conventional phagocytosis processes [61,62,63,64,65,66]. In addition to preventing subsequent necrosis, efferocytosis can inhibit inflammatory reactions, promote self-tolerance, and initiate the stimulation of proresolving pathway [67,68,69,70,71].

Intrinsic antimicrobial efficacy of MSCs

The immunomodulatory features of MSCs have raised concerns regarding potential adverse outcomes linked to unintended suppression of antimicrobial immune reactions, thereby heightening the susceptibility to infections. In line with this, recent studies have proposed that MSCs exhibit antimicrobial capabilities against multidrug-resistant strains, although the mechanisms underlying this activity are not fully understood. Chow and colleagues have provided evidence that MSCs generate diverse mediators with the ability to eliminate bacteria, such as secretory antimicrobial peptides and proteins (AMPs) [72]. Indirectly, AMPs play a role in the innate immune response of the host against pathogens, specifically in the dynamic regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory factors of the immune system or in the promotion of phagocyte function, leading to the mediation of immunological bactericidal effects by MSCs [73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. The evidence supports that MSCs have a direct antimicrobial capacity, as MSC-derived AMPs exhibit inherent abilities to eradicate microbial infections. Notable examples of these AMPs include cathelicidin peptide LL-37, hepcidin, β-defensin, cystatin C, elafin, and lipocalin. Interestingly, these AMPs are commonly found in neutrophils or epithelial cells [79,80,81,82]. Antimicrobial peptides, also referred to as “host defense peptides,” have exhibited various immunomodulatory roles in the context of resolving inflammation or infection, which are distinct for each type of AMPs [83, 84]. Particularly, cathelicidins and β-defensins exhibit chemotactic characteristics towards monocytes, neutrophils, MQs, and lymphocytes. Given the apparent involvement of vitamin D3 in increasing the production of LL-37, the incorporation of this vitamin during the cultivation of MSCs may enhance the expression of endogenous LL-37, offering a promising and innovative therapeutic strategy [85, 86]. Defensins are bioactive peptides displaying antimicrobial and antiviral properties. Consequently, regulating the endogenous synthesis of defensins, especially in scenarios characterized by reduced antimicrobial peptide generation, highlights their potential as therapeutic agents [73]. Hepcidin, functioning as an endogenous host defense peptide, demonstrates a broad spectrum of antimicrobial efficacy towards various fungal strains and clinically relevant bacteria. As a result, it has garnered considerable interest as a promising focal point for the advancement of novel therapeutic strategies [84].

Compared to other AMPs, lipocalins have garnered significant attention as a key area of research due to their unique biomarker characteristics, which act as an indirect defense mechanism against pathogens [87]. Lipocalins act as transporters, displaying a preference for attaching to small organic molecules that play a role in various essential biological processes like immune response, cell growth, proliferation, metabolism, prostaglandin synthesis, and iron transport. Elafin is recognized for its capacity to eradicate bacteria by disrupting their membrane structure, while the mechanism of action of cystatin C is not fully understood [82].

AMPs exhibit preferential efficacy toward a diverse spectrum of microorganisms, encompassing bacteria, yeasts, fungi, viruses, and even malignant cells. This efficacy of AMPs may be subject to additional regulation by the influence of infection-associated microbial structures and inflammatory agents [83]. The compact three-dimensional structures of biofilms create a conducive stroma for evading host immune responses, impacting macrophage polarization, bacterial phagocytosis inhibition, and neutrophil-mediated recruitment and killing limitation [72, 88]. Nevertheless, exposure to factors secreted by MSCs leads to an increase in monocyte recruitment, along with enhanced phagocytosis by MQs and neutrophils. Therefore, it is feasible that the use of MSCs could potentially enhance traditional antibiotic treatment.

AMPs interact with a variety of molecular targets, either on the cellular membrane or within the cytoplasm, to exert their antimicrobial activities and produce subsequent biological effects. In the research conducted by Sung and colleagues, microarray analysis was used to identify clusters of genes or molecular pathways potentially associated with the antimicrobial characteristics of MSCs. The results of their study indicated that the TLR-4 signaling pathway serves as a central paracrine factor that enhances the antimicrobial actions of MSCs and plays a crucial role in their anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects [89].

The production of antimicrobial agents appears to be an inherent attribute of MSCs, as evidenced by bactericidal assays. Furthermore, the activation of MSCs appears to represent a critical stage in optimizing the interaction between MSCs and the host’s innate immune defense to enhance the killing of bacteria. It is noteworthy that levels of AMPs have been observed to increase following priming with pro-inflammatory triggers such as IFNγ, IL-1β, or IL-12. Several investigations have indicated that MSCs can directly inhibit bacterial growth, even when using conditioned medium [78, 82,83,84, 87, 89]. These results suggest that MSC supernatants could serve as an adjunctive therapy alongside traditional antibiotics.

A recent study conducted by Yagi et al., has linked the secretome of MSCs to a biocompatible adjunctive treatment for musculoskeletal infections. Based on their research findings, the antimicrobial activity of MSCs could be influenced to some extent by the MSC-vitamin D receptor and its effect on the expression level of LL-37 (cationic antimicrobial peptide) [90]. Moreover, Yamamuro et al.. carried out a study using a rat periprosthetic joint infection model, revealing that the antimicrobial properties of MSCs (when combined with antibiotic treatment) could be attributed to the upregulation of cathelicidin expression and downregulation of inflammatory cytokine expression, IL-6 and TNF-α, at the infection site [91]. Johnson and colleagues previously concluded that combining activated MSCs with antibiotic treatment in mouse and dog models of chronic biofilm infection could offer a novel non-antimicrobial approach for managing drug-resistant infections [88]. According to their data, MSC therapeutic potency is, at least in part, mediated by the increased secretion of cathelicidin, which is significantly enhanced in the presence of antibiotics. On a mechanistic level, it was noted that MSCs have the capacity to accumulate at the peripheries of wounds, leading to the polarization of macrophages towards the M2 phenotype within infected tissues. Hence, the antimicrobial properties exhibited by MSCs when combined with antibiotic therapy can lead to enhanced efficacy of antibiotics, consequently reducing the necessary dosage for bacterial eradication. On the other hand, Harman et al. have identified that MSCs could serve as active reservoirs of antimicrobial properties, which impede the proliferation of bacteria and disrupt the structural integrity of bacteria typically present in skin wounds [82]. Interestingly, Bonfield and colleagues have extensively documented the antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic capabilities of MSCs, along with their effectiveness against intracellular bacterial pathogens, both in laboratory settings and living organisms [78, 92,93,94,95].

Overall, MSCs from various sources show both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects in preclinical models, though the underlying mechanism remains unclear [78, 96]. However, according to Rabani’s research and others, enhancing AMPs and promoting an inflammation-resolving phenotype in immune cells may explain the paradoxical effects of MSCs during in vivo infections [78, 88, 97]. This insight could help guide clinical trials exploring MSCs as an adjunct to antibiotics in treating highly resistant infections.

Internalization capacity and clearance of apoptotic cells by MSCs

There is a shortage of literature on studies focusing on the phagocytic, pinocytic, and endocytic capacities of MSCs, suggesting a potential role in the functions attributed to MSCs [98]. MSCs, as a heterogeneous subset of stromal stem cells [99], have demonstrated the capacity to interact with a range of microorganisms and non-biological substances, potentially via distinct receptors, including specific TLRs, NOD-like receptors, scavenger receptors (SRs), mannose receptors (MRs), and retinoic acid-inducible gene [83, 99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. Notably, the function of MRs and SRs remains unclear in most tissues and cells, including MSCs. However, Xu and colleagues have described that the proliferation of MSCs can normally be regulated by SRs involving MAPK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathways mediated by high-density lipoprotein [106]. According to the findings of Khan et al., MSCs internalize different components through SRs than those endocytosed through MRs, which has a critical role in an intrinsic control of bacterial growth [98, 105]. Additionally, the results from Costela Ruiz et al. have shown that MSCs can engulf particles of various sizes and types [107], and this phagocytosis enhances their modulatory function.

Zhang and co-authors confirmed that MSCs possess the capacity to internalize ABs, enhancing MSC-mediated immunosuppressive activity. Mechanistically, stimulation of the NF-κB pathway by ABs mediates the activation of the cyclooxygenase 2/prostaglandin E2 (COX2/PGE2) pathway, enhancing the immunoregulatory function of MSCs [108]. Studies on MSCs obtained from human bone marrow have elucidated that these cells exhibit discriminate between the living and the dead, suggesting a preservation of MSC efferocytosis [109,110,111]. Importantly, MSCs are equipped with the necessary receptors for programmed cell removal [112], including Axl and Tyro3, whose expression is regulated in an efferocytic manner, independent of the apoptotic target [113]. The process of MSC-efferocytosis may play a role in maintaining the homeostasis of the bone marrow environment, particularly in relation to bone loss [113]. On the other hand, research has demonstrated a progressive elevation in MSC-MHC-II expression during a narrow window of IFN-γ levels. The diverse functions of MSCs, including their role as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [114] and immune response regulators, can be attributed to their inherent adaptability, which is influenced by cytokine levels such as IFN-γ [99].

Moreover, the infused MSCs could be passively or actively induced to become ABs by a number of mechanisms. MSCs seem to have the ability to induce the phagocytic activity of other cells, such as polymorphonuclear cells or MQs [72]. Interestingly, promoting the engulfment of ABs has shown to be beneficial in immunologically mediated diseases [115, 116]. Finally, Zhang and colleagues observed that under transwell conditions, a slight increase in PGE2 levels was detected when the phagocytic activity of MSCs, acting as non-professional phagocytes, was inhibited. This finding is consistent with situations where the phagocytic activity of MSCs remained unaffected. Therefore, apart from phagocytosis, there might be certain factors released by ABs that contribute to augmenting the immunosuppressive functions of MSCs and potentially other phagocytes. This aspect warrants further exploration [108].

Hence, the process of phagocytosis involving ABs may signify a crucial juncture in the regulatory mechanisms employed by MSCs. Exploring approaches targeted at ABs offers the prospect of uncovering groundbreaking therapies to enhance the efficacy of MSC-mediated immunotherapy. Taken together, the role of MSCs as non-professional phagocytes -both “eaters” and “eaters of others”- may provide a novel basis for immunotherapy in managing localized and systemic infections, as well as immune-mediated conditions like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), which is characterized by impaired removal of dying cells. The complex characteristics of MSCs, including their role in immune regulation, phagocytic abilities, and expression of MHC II molecules, are crucial for maintaining tissue homeostasis, defending against infections, and modulating inflammatory reactions.

MSC apoptosis/efferocytosis/long-term effectiveness

Over the past few decades, MSCs have emerged as the most clinically studied experimental cell therapy, with significant advances achieved in their development as a promising solution for addressing a wide range of unrelated diseases [117]. However, concerns have been raised regarding the fate of these infused therapeutic cells, which have received considerable attention under in vivo conditions, with the finding that MSCs are therapeutically effective despite the lack of engraftment [58, 118]. According to data, the survival of MSCs following transplantation could be affected by the response of the host [119, 120]. Moreover, it is worth noting that research has indicated that MSCs’ survival rates also increase under conditions of oxidation, heat stress, hypoxia, and nutrient deprivation [121].

Research has provided evidence that distribution of MSCs after systemic delivery reveals a rapid entrapment of MSCs in the microvascular system of the lungs in rodent models, followed by their elimination from the circulatory system. According to findings presented by Pang and colleagues, MSCs located in the lung experience caspase 3-dependent apoptosis, followed by elimination by phagocytic cells [48]. In humans, however, intravenous infusion of MSCs would result in their widespread biodistribution and subsequent clearance from the circulation [8]. On the other hand, analysis of apoptotic markers in MSCs revealed that MSCs are resistant to several classical apoptosis inducers, and that apoptosis requires 6–18 h to be initiated. Subsequently, they accumulate in the liver and spleen, which are tissues where damaged or aged circulating blood cells are typically eliminated [48, 122,123,124,125]. These data have concluded that the majority of MSCs are no longer intact shortly post-transplantation and have a restricted lifespan [1, 126]. However, following transplantation, host effector cells would not immediately respond avidly to eliminate transplanted MSCs.

It is important to note that MSCs are resistant to allospecific cytotoxic lymphocyte cells (CTLs), which is consistent with the low surface expression of HLA class I molecules [127]. However, the expression of low levels of HLA class I molecules, regardless of autologous or allogeneic source, renders MSCs a susceptible target for natural killer cell (NK)-mediated lysis [128]. Importantly, NK-mediated lysis of MSCs is only efficient when NK cells are present in an active state [7, 128]. In particular, during inflammatory responses, MSCs are exposed to pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IFN-ɣ), which upregulate the surface expression of HLA class I on them, rendering MSCs resistant to NK-mediated lysis. Therefore, NK-mediated lysis of MSCs could be induced as a consequence of the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines and, consequently, the downregulation of HLA class I expression. On the other hand, MSC apoptosis can be triggered by the engagement of activating NK receptors by their respective ligands expressed on the surface of MSCs [128].

Galleu et al.. have found that MSCs are actively induced to undergo perforin-dependent apoptosis by recipient CTLs, whereby MSC-induced immunosuppression in patients with graft-versus-host disease is directly related to the high cytotoxic activity against MSCs [58]. Subsequently, recipient phagocytic cells, both specialized and non-specialized, engulf apoptotic MSCs and generate bioactive mediators that can facilitate the termination of inflammatory responses, promote self-tolerance, and activate pro-resolving pathways to restore homeostasis [129,130,131,132]. As a result, apoptosis of MSCs and the subsequent efferocytosis process may mediate the second phase of communication between MSCs and target cells (Fig. 1). Additional research has indicated that the process of perforin-dependent apoptosis of MSCs by CTLs or inducible autophagy [133, 134] is significantly involved in facilitating immunosuppression post-infusion [58, 118]. A distinct investigation has provided insights into the mechanism of apoptosis in MSCs, where the process takes place in a non-specific manner dependent on NO, inducing MSCs to exhibit programmed cell death [40]. Recognition of MSCs by CTLs is not antigen-specific as it does not require HLA engagement or result from alloreactive rejection, supporting the current practice of using allogeneic MSCs. Although an immunological synapse is not required, MSCs must be in physical contact with activated CTLs to undergo apoptosis. This supports a bystander role for the cytotoxic granules released by the activated CTLs. In the literature, lytic granule secretion has been described to precede the formation of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte/target cell synapse.

One plausible explanation is that, in the context of hot inflammation, activated T cells and NK cells interact by secreting IFN-γ, which induces the production of IDO by MSCs. This IDO production subsequently inhibits the functionality of activated T cells or NK cells. In contrast, in the stroma of cold inflammation - characterized by exhausted or inactivated T cells and NK cells - MSC-mediated immune regulation is reciprocally decreased [134,135,136]. These findings are consistent with data that has indicated a notable impairment in the proliferation of NK cells in the presence of MSCs, with no evidence of apoptotic or necrotic cell death [7]. Despite the well-established roles of TGF-β, IL-10, PGE2, and IDO in this context, there remains a significant gap in understanding the specific mechanisms by which MSCs inhibit NK cell activity [128].

In addition, evidence from clinical trials has shown that the three complement pathways (classical, alternative, and lectin) play a critical role in recognizing and directly damaging both autologous and allogeneic MSCs following their administration [137,138,139]. Of particular interest is the fact that MSCs can constitutively inhibit complement activation in their native tissue environment by locally secreting factor H [140]. This action helps to maintain MSC function and prolong their half-life [137]. Most interestingly, the chemotactic and immunomodulatory properties of MSCs can also be triggered by complement activation products, which are produced in the blood after systemic infusion of these cells. Conversely, it has also been observed that MSCs weakly stimulate the complement system of innate immunity. The observation that even autologous MSCs have the ability to induce complement suggests that naturally occurring apoptosis of MSCs is beneficial and may partially explain the significant improvement seen with MSC-based interventions [137]. However, when MSCs undergo apoptosis in hemolytic complement-deficient mice, complement activation is unlikely to be the primary mechanism involved [141]. Activated complement overwhelmed the protective function of intrinsic complement regulators on the cell surface of MSCs, resulting in cytotoxicity, subsequently recruits and activates leukocytes and enhances phagocytosis [137].

Pang et al.. intriguingly unveiled a mechanism of action in which the host’s response to dying MSCs plays a crucial role in their therapeutic benefits, even in the absence of cytotoxic host cells [48]. It is worth noting that MSCs are generally considered to be independent of major histocompatibility complex or species barriers, exhibiting a phenotypic profile that shields them from alloreactive T-cell reactions. The findings from Pang’s research team indicate that the elimination of BAK and BAX inhibits the death of MSCs and diminishes their immunosuppressive activity [48]. These results are particularly interesting as they propose a connection between MSCs’ apoptosis and peripheral immune responses, subsequently impacting distant tissue damage.

Given that caspase activation in MSCs may induce alternative pathways that promote the production of immunomodulatory molecules independently of efferocytosis signal generation, it is plausible that both early and late phases of MSC-driven immunomodulatory functions could occur simultaneously. This notion is supported by studies demonstrating that MSCs stimulate IL-1 signaling through caspase activation, leading to increased release of specific biomolecules [142].

It is clear that the involvement of recipient cellular networks plays a crucial role in facilitating the therapeutic benefits of MSCs and their derivatives. The study by Ko and colleagues has shown that MSCs induce immune tolerance by activating the recipient’s endogenous immune regulatory system, thereby providing long-term therapeutic benefits [143]. In line with this, some studies have shown that MSCs induce the expansion of myeloid cells with immunosuppressive activity and modulate the immunophenotype of monocytes/macrophages as important effectors of immune regulation and tolerance [123, 144]. These findings suggest that MSCs can induce long-lasting suppressive adaptive immune responses by inducing non-specific innate tolerance, even when MSCs are no longer present in the system.

The use of pharmacological compounds that specifically target modulators of apoptosis could enhance our understanding of the molecular components involved in MSC apoptosis. Recent work has shown that inactivated MSCs, which have lost their ability to secrete factors, still retain their regulatory capacity, suggesting that cell membrane-dependent interactions with immune cells may contribute to these regulatory effects [118, 145]. Importantly, because dead MSCs lack active cell metabolism, they cannot differentiate into other cell types in vivo [117]. In conclusion, despite the wealth of preclinical and clinical data, elucidating the underlying mechanisms of MSCs as a potential cell-based immunotherapy for a wide range of diseases remains a challenging endeavor. The ability to influence innate immune functions through epigenetic changes provides a promising way for MSCs to gain adaptive characteristics after being activated in disease states. This mechanism may explain how MSCs promote long-lasting immune tolerance, showcasing their potential for therapeutic use [79, 146, 147].

Table 1 A selection of studies indicating crosstalk between macrophages and therapeutic MSCs
Fig. 1
figure 1

Linking MSCs apoptosis to immunosuppression mechanisms. The combination of cues to which MSCs are subjected within the tissue stroma, and the resulting intracellular signaling cascade determine the particular immunomodulatory repertoire responsible for orchestrating the MSC-derived therapeutic activity [158]. The immunotherapeutic effect of MSCs is thought to occur in two interrelated phases. However, the fate of MSCs is only partially understood. Experimental data suggest that a hot inflammation (term for a stroma with high levels of inflammatory mediators/inducers such as IFN-γ (phase 1)) [159,160,161] may favor the protection of MSCs from cell-cytotoxicity by distinct mechanisms. While in cold inflammation (term for a stroma with intermediate levels of inflammatory mediators/inducers (phase 2)), the MSCs would behave in a different way. This may have relevant implications for the clinical application of MSCs. Importantly, the presence of different subpopulations of living MSCs, deceased MSCs, late apoptotic MSCs, early apoptotic MSCs, and autophagic cell death should be considered simultaneously [117, 162]. In the early phase, infused MSCs migrate to the focus of inflammation and injury to promote tissue repair and regeneration through paracrine effects, in the next phase apoptotic MSCs effectively regulate various aspects of the recipient cells. The short lifespan of MSCs gradually affected the transplanted cells [163, 164], with MSCs undergoing apoptosis through various mechanisms (described in detail throughout the document). Subsequently, MSC-derived apoptotic bodies are cleared by cells of the myeloid lineage (mainly neutrophils, MQs, and circulating monocytes) [117, 123]. Based on the “dying stem cell hypothesis,” efferocytosis of apoptotic MSCs induces phenotypic and functional changes in phagocytes, which then modulates both innate and adaptive immune responses [123, 164]

Modifying hepatic/splenic macrophages functional properties

The exact composition of the organ microenvironment differs according to the specific tissue types, characterized by the attributes of the immunocytes in their reaction to therapeutic strategies like MSC engraftment. The transplanted MSCs are mainly localized in the pulmonary tissue; however, a small number of MSCs traveled to the liver through different migration routes [151]. Moreover, the infused MSCs can modulate the function of splenic cells and enhance reparative mechanisms in distant organs. Macrophages play a key role in enhancing the recruitment and homing of MSCs. Conversely, the infusion of MSCs has been shown to increase the number of macrophages in the fibrotic liver [165]. Macrophages, being the predominant cell type engaged in efferocytosis, are pivotal in various physiological processes. A compilation of research works delineating the intercommunication between macrophages within the hepatic and splenic systems, and therapeutic MSCs has succinctly been presented in Table 1.

A recent investigation conducted by Liang et al. has revealed that systemic delivery of MSCs effectively regulates the ratio of M1 and M2 MQs within the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. This modulation is accomplished by reducing the quantity of M1 and increasing the population of M2 MQs [148]. Furthermore, a decrease in the levels of IL-1β and TNF-α has been documented, concomitant with an increase in the levels of IL-10. The synergistic impact of these changes leads to an enhancement in platelet counts and alleviates underlying immune system irregularities [148]. Fiore et al. demonstrated that macrophages derived from the fibrotic livers of mice treated with MSCs exogenously expressing IGF-I showed reduced expression profiles of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrogenic genes and overexpressed HGF, indicating a restorative phenotype [165]. In addition, MSCs have exhibited a significant influence in alleviating hepatic injury and inflammation through their extracellular vesicles (EVs), containing IL-10, which accumulate in the hepatic parenchyma [155]. Upon reaching the liver, EVs are engulfed by Kupffer cells, leading to the upregulation of PTPN22. Consequently, this sequence of events prompts Kupffer cells to transition into an anti-inflammatory phenotype, thus mitigating hepatic inflammation and injury. Moreover, MSC-EVs have been observed in circulation towards the liver subsequent to the transplantation of MSCs. The mechanism underlying the protective effect of MSC-EVs against liver fibrosis involves the transmission of miR-148a, which regulates the functions of intrahepatic macrophages via the KLF6/STAT3 signaling cascade. This interplay presents a promising avenue for targeting liver fibrosis therapeutically [157]. Besides, research has revealed that intravenously delivered MSCs tend to primarily accumulate in the spleen, leading to an increase in M2 MQs within the kidneys via the complex spleen-kidney immune interplay [150]. EVs originating from MSCs have been shown to induce distinct patterns of gene expression linked to hyperpolarization and stimulation of PGE2 in M2 MQs situated within the spleen. It is noteworthy that the clinical effectiveness of EVs has been observed to be less favorable in comparison to the direct administration of MSCs.

Furthermore, MSC-primed macrophages experience a shift from M1 to M2 immunophenotype, with distinguishable differences observable at the molecular epigenetic level. This transition triggers the activation of diverse immunological pathways that result in the production of numerous immunomodulatory molecules like TGF-β, IL-10, IDO, and PGE2. Consequently, macrophage depletion has been shown to abolish the beneficial effects of MSC therapy [165]. Liu et al. have reported on the discovery of the Akt/FoxO1 pathway’s role in facilitating the transition of macrophage phenotype and augmenting their phagocytic capability through MSC-mediated mechanisms. This process seems to play a part in reducing exaggerated inflammatory reactions. FoxO1, as one of the key downstream targets of the Akt pathway, serves as an essential nuclear transcription factor involved in various cellular processes such as cell differentiation and cellular metabolism. The subcellular localization of FoxO1 in the nucleus is observed in its non-phosphorylated state, whereas phosphorylation mediated by Akt induces its nuclear export, thereby dynamically regulating macrophage polarization through the process of phosphorylation [166]. These findings are consistent with the conclusions drawn from different experimental conditions, which indicate that the cells of both the innate and adoptive immune systems play a crucial role in facilitating and disseminating the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs.

Overall, transplanted MSCs have shown the ability to influence the polarization, phagocytic activity, and metabolic functions of macrophages through a variety of mechanisms. Among the mechanisms that have been elucidated are enhancing the activation of M2 MQs and the expression of MMP13 and IL-10, alongside inhibiting M1 MQs and the expression of IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6. Furthermore, MSCs have been found to possess the ability to enhance the production of PGE2, thereby mitigating organ damage in both in vivo and in vitro investigations [152, 153, 156]. More importantly, modified MSCs, such as those that have undergone cultivation in hypoxic environments (5% O2) or have been activated with pro-inflammatory cytokines, exhibited heightened efficacy in their therapeutic outcomes compared to naive MSCs [151, 167, 168].

Apoptotic MSCs and macrophages cross-talk following efferocytosis

While the infusion of MSCs initially has a significant impact on immunocytes, inducing changes in metabolic and signaling pathways, the subsequent apoptosis of MSCs leads to the formation of ABs containing various cellular components. Apoptosis, traditionally considered as an ‘immunologically silent’ mechanism of cellular death, is characterized by the lack of an inflammatory reaction [48]. In recent times, there has been a growing interest in investigating apoptosis as a process that stimulates intercellular communication, thereby facilitating the remodeling of adjacent tissues [169]. Apoptotic cells exhibit a number of distinct changes in their ultrastructural morphology, including the formation of plasma membrane blebs, nuclear fragmentation, and disintegration of the cell into apoptotic bodies. Subsequently, ABs containing fragmented organelles and other substances are engulfed and degraded by phagocytes [117]. It is noteworthy that ABs from the same apoptotic cell can contain different components, potentially influencing various biological outcomes. Therefore, ABs as cell trainers may have little long-term effect on immune cell function or consistent long-term tolerance. This suggests that specific components at particular concentrations could potentially trigger short-/long-term tolerogenic immunity. The occurrence of cross-tolerance phenomena may be induced through active involvement. Nevertheless, further investigation is required to validate this assertion.

Several studies have emphasized the significant potential of MSC-ABs engulfed by phagocytes in treating various pathological conditions. These effects are closely tied to the biological properties of MSC-ABs and their interaction with target cells (see Table 2). As such, the communication of MSC-ABs with a variety of immune cells, such as natural killer cells, dendritic cells, T cells, among others, has been validated to augment the immunotherapeutic effectiveness of MSC [48]. Research on tolerized cells focuses on the signaling and molecular mechanisms behind their induction. According to the ‘dying stem cell hypothesis’ [170,171,172], engulfing MSC-ABs may reduce inflammatory cytokine secretion and inflammatory cell infiltration, promoting tissue regeneration and wound healing [173, 174]. According to reports, MSC-derived ABs have the potential to be internalized by pre-osteoclasts, consequently facilitating bone remodeling by transferring miR-223-3p to osteoclasts [175].

Dynamic changes in chromatin structure across immunological pathways might contribute to the process of tolerance induced by ABs. Monocytes are stimulated by MSCs to acquire an anti-inflammatory phenotype, characterized by the production of IL-10, high expression levels of B220 and CD11b, and display of T-cell suppressive functions that are independent of FoxP3 + regulatory T cells [143]. TNF-α-induced gene/protein-6 (TSG-6) has been recognized as a key pathway responsible for mediating the induction of the phenotypic shift towards immune regulatory monocytes. In this context, MSCs with TSG-6 knockdown have been shown to be unable to induce an immunoregulatory state in monocytes. It has been established that TSG-6 can induce the differentiation of bone marrow-derived myeloid precursors into plasmacytoid dendritic cells with immunosuppressive activity, characterized by the markers CD11c+ B220+ CD8α+ [176].

Moreover, MSCs release chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) that attracts monocytes/macrophages to the injury site [177]. Evidence has revealed that MSCs promote monocyte viability via direct physical interactions [178]. Importantly, monocytes possess the capacity to generate pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-1β, upon exposure to MSCs, consequently triggering the immunosuppressive activity of MSCs. This process can skew the polarization of macrophages towards a specialized state, characterized by increased phagocytic capability and elevated secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β [178,179,180,181].

MSCs also possess the ability to modify the immune response through specific interactions with classical monocytes, either by triggering selective apoptosis or by prompting a transition to a non-classical phenotype characterized by elevated levels of PD-L1 expression [49, 123]. It is imperative to underscore that these particular modifications are closely linked to the monocytes’ capacity to efferocytose the apoptotic MSCs, rather than being influenced solely by the soluble factors released by MSCs [123]. Monocytes containing apoptotic MSCs undergo systemic migration through the circulatory system, with a notable affinity for the hepatic and splenic regions. Additionally, remnants of MSCs are captured within the hepatic microenvironment and subsequently phagocytosed by Kupffer cells [123]. Consequently, monocytes are capable of inducing long-term adaptive immune responses when they differentiate into macrophages.

Furthermore, the immunosuppressive secretome of MSCs inhibits monocyte differentiation into dendritic cells, reduces DC maturation, and promotes a regulatory and strong phagocytic phenotype in mature DCs (as outlined in [52]). On the other hand, DCs possess the capacity to efficiently engulf apoptotic bodies, thereby impeding the progression of phenotypic maturation within these cells. Additionally, antigens originating from engulfed apoptotic cells can be cross-presented by DCs, suggesting that apoptotic cells might selectively present immunologically important antigenic determinants [182, 183]. Nevertheless, the impact of MSC-derived apoptotic bodies on DCs remains to be investigated.

In brief, macrophages are recognized as the predominant population of mononuclear phagocytes residing in various tissues, while DCs are considered the primary APC responsible for T cell priming [184, 185]. The generation of apoptotic bodies is a consequence of the process of apoptosis [180, 181, 186, 187]. Upon introduction into the systemic circulation, apoptotic cells are rapidly taken in by MQs and DCs located in the spleen, liver, and lungs [188,189,190]. The important role of macrophages, a specific type of white blood cells responsible for engulfing and eliminating apoptotic bodies, is significant in the initiation, advancement, and resolution of inflammation through undergoing phenotypic conversion. It is noteworthy that there is a suggestion that apoptotic cells tend to be phagocytosed by MQs [191]. Various surface markers present on apoptotic bodies (ABs) have been shown to stimulate the recruitment of MQs to sites of cell death. The internalization of ABs may result in the transformation of MQs into a phenotype that resembles M2 MQs, known for their involvement in anti-inflammatory processes. An example of this phenomenon is the efferocytosis of MSC-derived ABs by alveolar MQs, a mechanism that has been found to mediate immunomodulation and decrease the severity of autoimmune disorders. The aforementioned observations indicate that apoptosis serves as a highly immunomodulatory phenomenon in the context of MSC transplantation, operating through the intermediary role of MQs. The secretion of soluble mediators by MQs subsequent to the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells plays a crucial role in influencing the activities of dendritic cells, manifesting a potent inhibitory effect on the maturation process of dendritic cells [185,186,187, 192, 193]. DCs within organs play a crucial role in maintaining peripheral T cell tolerance [183, 186, 189, 194,195,196,197], process that restrains both innate and adaptive immune responses to antigens presented on dying cells and upholds immune tolerance [178]. Various factors such as the intrinsic characteristics of cells undergoing apoptosis, the efficacy of their clearance, the specific environment in which apoptosis occurs, and the presence of opsonins bound to the apoptotic cells collectively shape the influence of apoptotic cells on the recipient APCs. This, in turn, impacts the ability of APCs to either enhance or suppress immune reactions [198, 199].

Natural killer cell-MSCs crosstalk facilitated by monocyte/macrophages

The interaction between MQs and NK cells suggests that transplanted MSCs are likely to modulate NK cells through both direct and indirect mechanisms, which involve regulating MQs [200,201,202]. Rather than inherently functioning as immunosuppressant cells, MSCs can display immunostimulatory characteristics that depend on the specific microenvironment. MSCs have been shown to exhibit distinct immunomodulatory abilities that affect the functionality of mature immune cells, including the NK cell lineage. A notable example of this phenomenon is the requirement for MSCs to depend on specific components in their microenvironment, such as IL-10, to facilitate the expression of the soluble HLA-G5 protein [203]. Monocytes, as a substantial source of IL-10, are essential contributors to efferocytosis, a process potentially regulated by the collective activation of receptors that serve as primary mediators. Selmani et al. have illustrated that the interaction with HLA-G-specific receptors, such as KIR2DL4 found on NK cells, inhibits the cytotoxic, adhesion, and migratory functions of NK cells [203]. It is well-established that MSCs are hypoimmunogenic cells in an undifferentiated state, leading to a potentially specific close contact with immunocytes that demonstrate a specific affinity for MSCs.

In this particular context, it is widely believed that TLR4 plays a crucial role in initiating the immune response to eliminate pathogenic microorganisms. However, a study by Lu et al. found that TLR4+ MSCs located in the tumor stroma exhibited greater efficacy in inhibiting the function and proliferation of NK cells compared to TLR4 MSCs [204]. Two distinct subpopulations of NK cells have been identified, with one exhibiting heightened cytotoxicity and the other characterized by high amounts of cytokine secretion. NK cells possess the capacity to eliminate virally infected, stressed, and cancerous cells through their cytotoxic function. Moreover, there has been documented evidence of the emergence of NK cells with regulatory roles during pregnancy [205]. Moreover, the liver has been identified as the predominant immunological solid organ enriched in distinct lineages of NK cells. The therapeutic potential of MSCs interacting with NK cells may play a role in influencing the immune response in liver damage, autoimmune liver conditions, and liver tumorigenesis. On the other hand, NK cells are considered to be one of the major effector cells mediating reactions such as graft-versus-leukemia [206, 207]. Hence, MSCs could potentially act as accessory cells in modulating the activity of NK cells in a manner that depends on the subtype. NK cells have been studied for their crucial role in the effective lysis of both self and non-self MSCs, leading to the subsequent elimination of MSCs post-transplantation. This process is further characterized by heightened cytokine secretion and activation of NK cells [128]. Notably, the outcomes of separate research endeavors converge to support and validate each other. Based on the findings of the Petri et al. [208] and the Martinez et al. [209], a complex and time-dependent model of coordinated interplay involving polarization and licensing between MSCs and NK cells has been postulated. During the early phases, MSCs are capable of enhancing the functional capacity of NK cells, leading to increased cytotoxicity and degranulation. Correspondingly, Cui et al. have reported that MSCs contribute to the upregulation of IFN-γ release from activated NK cell lineages through a positive feedback loop established between activated NK cells and MSCs. This interaction occurs in a manner that is dependent on both cellular contact and lack thereof, resulting in a heightened inflammatory response of NK cells [210]. Early events may then lead to the upregulation of immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic properties in MSCs, influenced by a more pronounced reduction in ligands that activate NK cells (such as ULBP1, B7H6, and ULBP2) following exposure to IFN-γ. At the same time, the expression of the immunosuppressive molecule galectin 1 may be heightened. Consistent with reports, MSCs possess various ligands for both activating and inhibiting NK cell receptors. Abomaray et al. have discussed the potential interactions between these ligands and NK cell receptors [211]. At subsequent time points, NK cell functionality is restricted by TGF-β and IL-6, leading to the cessation of inflammatory reactions through the induction of a regulatory senescent-like NK cell phenotype characterized by the absence of CD16. Moreover, the presence of TGF-β on activated NK cells has been shown to hinder cytokine production and reduce the expression of certain activation markers such as NKp44, CD69, and CD25 [212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220]. Additionally, numerous investigations have outlined the impact of MSCs on suppressing NK cell activity [55, 221]. The results of Ishida et al. showed that co-transplantation of expanded MSCs (with IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1β) suppressed NK cell function and migration in the liver of experimental mouse models of islet transplantation. Their results indicated that PGE2 (derived from MSCs) mediated the suppression of NK cells and subsequently improved islet graft survival [222]. On the other hand, Pradier and colleagues have investigated the effect of allogeneic MSCs on activated NK cell function in vitro and report a reduction in the proliferation and cytotoxic behavior of NK cells mediated by IDO in a long-term contact to promote exhaustion of NK cell function [223]. Surprisingly, the feedback of regulatory NK cells to MSCs promotes their survival, proliferation, and pro-angiogenic properties. During this feedback, senescent-like NK cells favor tissue-regenerative functions of MSCs over MSC killing. In support of this hypothesis, the Dastagir et al.‘s findings on NK cell-mediated repair and regeneration also revealed that the regenerative role of mesenchymal progenitor cells is dependent on NK cytotoxicity [224]. Notably, the survival of MSCs from NK cytotoxicity was enhanced with senescent-like NK cell effectors. Hence, the interaction between NK cells and MSCs amplifies the regulatory response of NK cells and promotes the proliferation of MSCs. These findings suggest that NK cells play a crucial role in promoting regeneration by positively regulating MSC differentiation, proliferation, and viability. Consequently, MSC-NK crosstalk may link the initial inflammatory immune response to the subsequent resolution of inflammation and tissue repair. In addition to the secretion of various factors like elevated levels of IL-15, IDO, and TGF-β [55, 223,224,225,226]. that result in NK cell inhibition, the indirect influence of MSCs on NK cells might be facilitated through MQs [226, 227].

In a unique scenario, MSCs have the potential to induce macrophage polarization towards an M2-like phenotype. These polarized MQs, in turn, exert inhibitory effects on NK cells and other components of the immune system. Within NK cells, their primary effects are on activation status and cytokine production [178]. Emerging findings have demonstrated that MSCs play a crucial role in supporting the viability of monocytes as they differentiate into MQs. Moreover, MSCs have been shown to influence the polarization of these MQs towards a peculiar M2-like functional phenotype, characterized by enhanced phagocytic capabilities and elevated secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β. Specifically, in interactions with activated NK cells, M2-like MQs were found to suppress the expression of activating molecules like NKp44, CD69, and CD25, as well as the production of IFN-γ [178]. On the other hand, the M2-like MQs express the ligands of PD-1, which bind to the inhibitory receptor identified on the membrane of immune effector cells such as NK cells. The engagement of PD-1 and PD-Ls serves to limit both the magnitude and the duration of the immune response. Interestingly, the M2-like MQ has an unstable functional phenotype and has the ability to respond to changes in the environment (such as pro-inflammatory triggers) and undergo polarization towards a pro-inflammatory/immunostimulatory functional phenotype. Consequently, upon interaction with these cells, NK cells may retain the expression of activating receptors and the capacity to secrete cytokines [79, 178]. Indeed, within a complex and reciprocal interplay, the generation of various factors like MCP-1 is amplified by the stimulation of MSCs through IFN-γ originating from NK cells, a process linked to the existence of IL-12 and IL-18 cytokines. The chemotactic agents discharged by MSCs, notably CCL2/MCP-1, have the ability to recruit cells expressing the C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), such as MQs and NK cells, thus uniquely influencing the activities of various cell populations within the immune system and their subsets. Several lines of evidence support the notion of the ability of MSCs to attract granulocytes and MQs [79, 228].

Qu et al.. (2015) proposed that MSCs have the ability to suppress NK cell activation and their chemotactic function by inhibiting the expression of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor type 5 (S1PR5), a crucial receptor involved in the trafficking of NK cells in vivo [203, 207]. Consistent with a prior investigation, the cytotoxicity, adherence, and migratory capabilities of NK cells may be impaired through interactions with HLA-G-specific receptors such as KIR2DL4 and ILT-2 present on NK cells [203].

Overall, NK cells play a critical role as innate cellular effectors in the elimination of virus-infected cells and in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation. Nevertheless, NK cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of graft-versus-host disease, which can be fatal in some cases. In such situations, the administration of MSCs may be considered as a novel therapeutic option for patient intervention. It is important to highlight that the considerable inhibition of cytotoxic activity triggered by MSCs should not be a cause for concern, as its correlation with the reduction in immune surveillance remains unclear [211]. Hence, owing to the reciprocal interplay between MSCs and NK cells, the utilization of MSCs might not interfere with the favorable outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and could also alleviate acute liver injury (as demonstrated in mouse models of polyI: C-induced liver injury) [224]. MSCs possess the capacity to attract NK cells through the secretion of chemokines and trap them via adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1 and VCAM‐1. They also promote the process of revascularisation and subsequently enhance suppression through direct cell-cell interactions [229]. These results collectively imply that crucial attributes associated with phenotypic alterations and the onset of senescence/apoptosis in NK cells may potentially be induced by activated MSCs. Interestingly, MSCs exert a variety of immunomodulatory effects on NK cells, thus influencing immune-related conditions in which NK cells play an important role.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Intercellular communication and potential outcomes between NK cells and MSCs. During the stage phase, MSCs upregulate the cytotoxic capabilities of NK cells. NK-MSC interactions lead to the secretion of IFN-γ by NK cells. Activated MSCs with IFN-γ (MSC1) increase their levels of MHC class I. Boosting MHC class I presentation may provide MSCs with protection against the destruction caused by NK cells [230, 231]. This is accomplished by shifting the balance towards the inhibition of NK cell activity, which results in the transmission of inhibitory signals and the hindrance of the cytotoxic capabilities of NK cells [232]. Nevertheless, there is evidence indicating that MSCs could be regarded as targets sensitive to lysis by activated NK cells [128, 218, 233]. On the contrary, during the resolution phase of inflammation, MSCs in a bioactive mediators-dependent manner induce an inhibitory effect on NK cell proliferation, cytokine secretion, expression of surface-activating receptors, and coreceptors, as well as induce senescence of inflammatory NK cells with a less responsive phenotype [55, 208]. IDO, PGE2, TGF-β, IL-10, and sHLA-G5 are key regulators of the mentioned effects. Furthermore, scientific evidence has demonstrated that MSCs exhibit the capacity to directly hinder the cytotoxic capability of NK cells through the downregulation of perforin and STAT3 [218, 234]. Overall, MSCs have the capability to enhance the cytotoxic activity of NK cells during the initial stages. Subsequently, they have the potential to promote a regulatory phenotype or trigger senescence in activated NK cells [208]. Importantly, it has also been postulated that MSCs exhibit inherent heterogeneity, which may influence the MSC-NK cell interaction [235]. Additionally, MSCs demonstrate varied crosstalk patterns with different NK cell populations [236]

Comparison of the three classical types of extracellular vesicles from MSCs

In recent times, there has been a growing interest among various research teams in the exploration of MSC-derived ABs as a novel type of therapeutic biological vehicles containing functional biomolecules aimed at organ regeneration and safeguarding. Various cell types, including but not limited to stem cells, immunocytes, precursor cells, osteoblasts, and endothelial cells, have the capacity to produce EVs [237, 238]. The content of EVs is contingent upon their origin, dimensions, and biogenesis pathway, characterized by surface markers. Similar to cytokines and growth factors, EVs have emerged as a novel mode of intracellular communication, which could facilitate the transport of their bioactive cargo to nearby or distant target cells. Consequently, EVs influence cellular behavior through paracrine and endocrine signaling mechanisms. Evidently, the diverse cargo enclosed within EVs is not random, suggesting specific processes for packaging components within these vesicles [239]. For instance, specific EVs have the capability to convey functionally active receptors between different cells [240].

Three subpopulations of classical EVs have been identified: apoptotic bodies, microvesicles (MVs), and exosomes. They vary in diameter from around 50 nm to over 5 μm, with the larger vesicles often referred to as ABs. Each subpopulation has distinct biophysical properties and physiological functions [239, 241,242,243,244]. They are similar lipid bilayer membrane regulatory nanoparticles and exert their own messages by delivering their cargo (vast repertoire of molecules) to targeted immune effectors and other non-immune recipient cells. Exosomes, formed by budding into endosomes and released through exocytosis, and MVs, shed by outward blebbing of the plasma membrane, are released from metabolically active cells, whereas ABs are generated during apoptosis [245]. Natural exosomes, which are small-sized membrane-bound structures, exhibit a preference for targeting immunocytes over phagocytes through blocking phagocytosis. Conversely, engineered exosomes could be associated with the phagocytic system [246]. MVs are characterized by their larger size compared to exosomes and also possess the ability to evade phagocytosis. Moreover, MVs demonstrate a closer resemblance to their parental cell in terms of protein composition when compared to exosomes. The impact of exosomes and MVs can vary significantly, ranging from immunostimulation to immunosuppression, depending on the origin cell. Furthermore, the internalization process of apoptotic cells, also referred to as efferocytosis, plays a crucial role in triggering intrinsic mechanisms like tissue growth, restructuring, regeneration, and specifically, the resolution of inflammation for the maintenance of homeostasis (Table 2).

In contrast, ABs are larger than MVs and exosomes, influencing both professional and non-professional phagocytes. As a result, MQs and DCs constitute their primary target cells. MVs and exosomes, on the other hand, perform a function similar to their originating cells, while ABs are recognized predominantly for their anti-inflammatory properties aimed at preserving homeostasis. Research by Florek et al.. and by Williams et al. has demonstrated that apoptotic cells can promote immune tolerance by modulating the maturation of APCs, resulting in reduced dendritic cell activation [183, 247]. In relation to the size of EVs, exosomes are identified as the smallest subtype of EVs, with a size of approximately 50 nm, implying enhanced oral bioavailability and stability. Conversely, the majority of ABs have a size of about 1 μm, potentially suggesting a propensity to target MQs via the mechanism of phagocytosis, which involves the engulfment of particles larger than 0.5 μm. Although the antigen-presenting feature of MSCs and their significance in immunomodulation and immune tolerance have been elucidated, exosomes’ evasion of the mononuclear phagocyte system leads to reduced antigen presentation.

Similar to exosomes, MVs derived from MSCs exhibit immunomodulatory properties and have been shown to regulate inflammatory responses [248, 249]. Both MVs and exosomes exhibit a multi-targeting characteristic, along with an extended circulation period. These vesicles possess high potential for delivery, increased cellular uptake (excluding the mononuclear phagocyte system), and a notable targeting ability, particularly post modification or engineering. Consequently, exosomes and microvesicles find application in a variety of therapeutic approaches [250,251,252]. Despite this, the complex and ineffective process of isolating and purifying exosomes poses difficulties for their scale-up in both production and clinical application [253, 254].

The production of apoptotic cell-derived extracellular vesicles, known as ABs, is notable for being regulated in a time-dependent manner, leading to variations in their molecular composition, cargo, and overall profile [255,256,257]. A recent study conducted by Zhang et al. has revealed that different types of apoptotic vesicles play specific biological roles in regulating stem cell functions and responses, as well as influencing tissue rejuvenation. This influence is primarily linked to the diverse protein and mRNA content found within the various subtypes [258].

The dimensions of the small blebs, known as apoptotic microvesicles or exosome-like entities, exhibit a gradual augmentation during the process of apoptosis, culminating in the creation of substantial extracellular vesicles denoted as apoptotic bodies. Specifically, the allocation of cellular constituents within apoptotic bodies encompasses a diverse array of potentially bioactive components [237]. An example of this is the presence of RNA in apoptotic bodies without concurrent presence of DNA, indicating a potential selective mechanism for the entry of certain biomolecules into EVs [259]. Furthermore, it has been noted that the number of EVs produced per cell in MSCs is higher in comparison to other cell types [260,261,262]. EVs predominantly contain elements like the extracellular matrix, endoplasmic reticulum, immune response factors, and cell adhesion proteins, whereas ABs are enriched in functional proteins related to cellular functions, metabolism, transportation, and the management of different diseases [263,264,265].

ABs typically exhibit low immunogenicity, a phenomenon influenced not only by signals originating from themselves but also by the specific cell type responsible for their capture (e.g., phagocytes lodged in the spleen and liver) [179, 266]. Indeed, the process of phagocytosis involving cellular remnants serves to attract inflammatory cells and consequently serves as a mechanism to mitigate inflammation [169, 267].

Apoptosis is intricately linked with cell differentiation, exemplified by the transformation of monocytes into MQs [268]. Thus, apoptosis and differentiation may act synergistically in initiating the immunoregulatory response, a concept applicable to various pathological conditions like autoimmunity, cancer, and infection [269]. Notably, the engulfment of apoptotic cells through phosphatidylserine-mediated mechanisms stimulates MQs to secrete TGF-β1, thereby facilitating inflammation resolution [56, 270].

Autoantigens are likewise incorporated into small ABs at the onset of apoptosis. As a result, ABs may regulate antigen presentation in various disease contexts, including autoimmunity. The engulfment of ABs containing intracellular autoantigens by MQs suggests that ABs might play a role in autoimmune regulation through the presentation of autoantigens [56]. ABs transfer autoantigens to neighboring or distant cells in different tissues via the circulation system. Consequently, through the incorporation of autoantigens into MSCs, it is plausible that their ABs could play a role for biotherapeutics in restoring tolerance in autoimmune disorders. Modified ABs may exhibit superior efficacy in transporting genes, proteins, and chemical compounds to MQs when compared to smaller liposomes, attributed to their distinctive surface molecules such as phosphatidylserine (PS) and calreticulin, as well as their larger dimensions [271]. Remarkably, the integration into liposomal bilayers has been utilized to further augment the alterability of natural vesicles and generate composite vesicles [272].

Extracellular vesicles, known as exosomes originating from MSCs and their distinctive attributes concerning the regulation of the immune system and facilitation of tissue repair, have been comprehensively examined in recent literature [253, 254, 273]. Consequently, in the context of this review, we have tried to present the recent knowledge on mechanisms of action involved in the therapeutic effects of MSC-ABs as an innovative therapeutic intervention. Overall, EVs originating from MSCs are recognized as crucial paracrine modulators that mimic the functionalities of their parent cells. The manipulation of MSCs and their secreted factors could potentially improve the efficacy of EVs including ABs in therapeutic applications, achieved by modulating their properties in a laboratory setting or by modifying the parent cell lineage.

Proregenerative behavior of apoptotic vesicles-MSC

In this context, increasing studies underline the role of stem cells as powerful instruments in organ regeneration. An interesting finding is that apoptotic bodies can stimulate the expansion of resident stem/progenitor cells, thereby facilitating tissue regeneration and replacing dysfunctional cells (Table 2) [261].

Based on this data, the findings suggest that MSC-ABs, when taken up by recipient endothelial cells, play a role in stimulating angiogenesis and helping to improve cardiac performance by modulating autophagy [274]. Li et al.. demonstrated that apoptotic vesicles from MSCs could be ingested by endothelial cells (ECs), leading to increased expression of genes related to angiogenesis. This led to the revascularization of dental pulp and regeneration of dental-pulp-like tissue. At a molecular level, the apoptotic vesicles, containing mitochondrial Tu translation elongation factor, can transport and regulate the angiogenic stimulation of ECs through the transcription factor EB-autophagy pathway [275]. Additionally, literature has shown that apoptotic vesicles from youthful MSCs can rejuvenate senescent MSCs by reinstating autolysosome formation, offering a promising approach to age-related bone deterioration [276]. According to Dong et al., apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs can accelerate skin wound healing, improve the quality of granulation tissue, and reduce scar size by influencing fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Mechanistically, these vesicles could be ingested by fibroblasts and ECs, significantly boosting their proliferation and movement. Furthermore, they could also promote adipogenic differentiation and inhibit fibrogenic differentiation of fibroblasts [277]. Previous studies have shown that externally sourced apoptotic vesicles from MSCs stimulate metabolic processes in the integumentary system, including the skin and hair follicles. For instance, these vesicles stimulate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway which is crucial for promoting wound healing and hair growth [171].

Impaired programmed cell death has been established to be closely associated with age-related disorders. Nevertheless, apoptotic vesicles originating from young MSCs have successfully revitalized the nuclear abnormalities observed in aged MSCs from bone marrow. Furthermore, they have also restored the diminished ability of these cells to self-renew and differentiate into bone or fat cells by triggering autophagy. In terms of the underlying mechanisms, the young apoptotic MSCs have the capacity to produce and accumulate a considerable quantity of Ras-related protein 7 within the apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs, which can be taken up and utilized by the recipient aged MSCs to re-establish the formation of autolysosomes. Consequently, this facilitates the initiation of autophagy flux and plays a role in the revitalization of MSCs, contributing to the rejuvenation of MSCs [276]. Huang and colleagues have clarified the vital role of apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs in protecting tissues from DNA damage [278]. Apoptosis can facilitate the accumulation of various nuclear DNA repair proteins, such as full-length PARP1, within these apoptotic vesicles. Subsequently, the vesicles are transferred directly to target cells, leading to the restoration of DNA damage and the elimination of senescent cells. In an independent investigation, Liu and colleagues have revealed that ABs originating from MSCs have the ability to be internalized by recipient ECs, leading to the stimulation of lysosomal activities and increase in TFEB (transcription factor EB) expression. TFEB functions as a crucial controller in lysosomal formation and autophagy. The consequent elevation of autophagy in ECs has been linked to the facilitation of angiogenesis and the improvement of cardiac function restoration. The observed properties of MSC-derived ABs shed light on the potential therapeutic benefits of these vesicles in conditions characterized by abnormal angiogenesis and impaired tissue regeneration [274]. Chen et al. have verified that the local implantation of MSC-derived apoptotic vesicles effectively enhanced bone regeneration within the calvarial defect. The underlying mechanism involves the promotion of new bone formation by apoptotic vesicles-MSCs through the elevation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels to trigger JNK signaling, potentially stimulating the proliferation, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of recipient MSCs [279].

Immunomodulatory activity of apoptotic vesicles-MSC

ABs play a major role in immune regulation through their clearance by immune effectors. ABs’ engulfment may support MSC homeostasis by modulating cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and subsequent secretome. Similarly, ABs can also regulate antigen presentation via these mechanisms in various disease settings, including autoimmunity. Wang et al. recently revealed that MSC-derived ABs directly interact with TCD4+ cells and prevent Th17 differentiation, while Foxp3+ cells are maintained [280]. A mechanistic explanation lies in the exposed phosphatidylserine PS on apoptotic vesicles, which facilitates the interaction with T cells, disrupting the proximal signaling transduction of T cell receptors. This procedure inhibits the expression of CD25 and the production of IL-2, IFN-γ, IL17A, and IL-10, ultimately contributing to the mitigation of lupus and arthritis.

Indeed, the available literature indicates that MSC-ABs have demonstrated efficacy in suppressing the formation of hypertrophic scars by modulating the inflammatory response. The ability of MSC-ABs to boost the expression of TSG-6 has been reported as one of the underlying mechanisms, which is partially mediated through caspase-3 activation, underscoring the role of apoptosis in facilitating the anti-inflammatory properties of MSCs [281].

Liu et al.. found that ABs derived from MSCs promote cutaneous wound healing partially by converting MQs to an anti-inflammatory phenotype, which enhances the migration and proliferation of fibroblasts, thereby facilitating the wound healing process [174]. Importantly, apoptotic MSCs have been recognized as a promising advancement in clinical applications, particularly in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. This innovative strategy has demonstrated to target the reduction of the inflammatory exudate and vascular permeability in the pulmonary system. Experimental findings have provided insight into the underlying mechanism by which apoptotic MSCs operate, revealing their capacity to diminish pro-inflammatory cytokines, suppress IFN-γ gene expression, and enhance the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 [282]. As a result, this chain of events leads to a decrease in the pathological damage observed in cases of acute lung injury. Sung and colleagues have documented that the application of apoptotic MSCs in the management of experimental sepsis syndrome may signify a pioneering therapeutic method because of their potential to shield pivotal organs such as the liver and kidney from harm. The central process involves the ability of apoptotic MSCs to downregulate the expression of various inflammatory factors (ICAM-1, MMP-9, TNF-α, NF-κB), as well as oxidative and apoptotic markers (Bax, caspase-3, PARP). Additionally, they decrease the population of inflammatory cells (CD3+) in the pulmonary system and reduce the levels of the DNA damage biomarker (γ-H2AX) in the renal system [282]. In contrast, an increase in antiapoptotic markers (e.g., Bcl-2) and mitochondrial integrity markers (e.g., cytochrome C) has been observed. This is accompanied by the detection of antioxidant markers, both at the protein level (GR, GPx, NQO-1, HO-1) and the cellular level (GR, GPx). Furthermore, a study by Ye et al.. demonstrated that apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs can enhance muscle regeneration by transmitting intercellular signals through the release of metabolites via the activated Pannexin 1 channel [283]. Ye et al.. have similarly noted that apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs have the ability to be phagocytosed by MQs, resulting in a reduction of COX2 expression within proinflammatory MQs. This mechanism effectively inhibits the release of TNF-α and IL-6, while concurrently promoting the secretion of IL-10. From a mechanistic standpoint, apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs inhibit the transformation of MQs into proinflammatory phenotypes by acting on the AMPK/SIRT1/NF-κB pathway. Moreover, these vesicles also suppress the generation of osteoclasts, bone resorption, and MMP-9 expression, thereby potentially providing valuable perspectives for addressing periodontitis [131]. Zheng et al. discovered that MSC-derived apoptotic vesicles, when efferocytosed by MQs, influence the homeostasis of liver MQs in response to type 2 diabetes (T2D). The mechanism underlying this phenomenon involves the ability of MSC-derived apoptotic vesicles to induce transcriptional reprogramming of MQs in an efferocytosis-dependent manner. This cascade of events ultimately leads to the suppression of macrophage accumulation and the transition of MQs toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype within the context of T2D in the liver [264]. The Zhang ei al., has also offered an extensive proteomic overview of apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs, highlighting their potential in the management of hemophilia A. Through a mechanistic lens, apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs carry imprints including Fas, enabling interaction with platelets’ FasL to trigger platelet activities, thereby ameliorating the hemostatic anomaly [263]. Altogether, as mentioned throughout this article, the process of clearing apoptotic bodies necessitates phagocytes to express specific receptors that can identify ligands associated with apoptotic bodies, subsequently prompting a proresolving phenotype in MQs by reducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and elevating the levels of proresolving mediators [67, 69, 284, 285]. Upon ingestion of apoptotic bodies, MQs inhibit the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and promote the generation of molecules that suppress inflammation and facilitate resolution and tissue repair. These crucial processes are compromised in conditions characterized by impaired efferocytosis [68, 69, 286,287,288]. While DCs engaging in efferocytosis of infected ABs can trigger the display of pathogen antigens and activation of effector T cells for host defense, this sequence is typically absent when non-infected ABs are engulfed by resolving MQs [66, 289]. Consequently, interventions directed at enhancing efferocytosis are anticipated to mitigate inflammation and promote resolution.

Using apoptotic MSC-derived vesicles to inhibit disease progression

Exogenous MSC-ABs have been shown to possess the capacity to reverse damage in endogenous MSCs, a process that is crucial for maintaining bone homeostasis and managing osteoporosis. Mechanistically, endogenous MSCs have the capability to internalize exogenous MSC-ABs via integrin avb3 and inhibit Axin. Moreover, the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is facilitated by ubiquitin ligases RNF146 and miR-328-3p originating from ABs [172]. On the other hand, apoptotic vesicles derived from MSCs have demonstrated the ability to integrate into hepatic tissue and undergo selective internalization by hepatocytes, indicating their potential use for hepatic regeneration and protection against acute liver failure. The mechanistic process involves the formation of a composite organelle structure between apoptotic vesicles and the recipient Golgi apparatus through SNARE-mediated membrane interaction, subsequently promoting the organization of microtubules and cytokinesis in hepatocytes [290].

In the same direction, the results obtained by Li et al.. have demonstrated that MSC-ABs inhibit osteoclast differentiation and alveolar bone resorption. From a mechanistic standpoint, miR-223-3p shows significant enrichment within those apoptotic bodies. Itgb1 is targeted by miR-223-3p, which interferes with the function of osteoclasts. Additionally, DC-STAMP is a key regulator that mediates membrane infusion. ABs and pre-osteoclasts express high levels of DC-STAMP on their membranes, mediating the engulfment of ABs by pre-osteoclasts. Collectively, MSC-derived ABs are directed towards internalization by pre-osteoclasts through the DC-STAMP pathway. This process results in the mitigation of alveolar bone loss by delivering miR-223-3p to osteoclasts, subsequently inhibiting their differentiation and bone resorption. These results could suggest that MSC-derived ABs are promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of periodontitis [175]. Xin et al.. have discovered that in situ injection of MSC-ABs could efficiently reduce fibrosis and promote endometrial regeneration, resulting in fertility restoration. Mechanistically, ABs could induce macrophage immunomodulation, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis [291]. Additionally, research has provided evidence that apoptotic MSCs can counteract the occurrence of a distinct variant of programmed cell death known as excessive extracellular trap formation (NETosis) in neutrophils [292, 293]. NETosis is important in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including SLE and mortality in sepsis [294,295,296,297,298]. Surprisingly, MSC-ABs can initiate the Fas/FasL pathway, thereby altering the signaling patterns that guide neutrophils to undergo programmed cell death, shifting them toward NETosis instead. Besides, MSCs can increase the longevity of neutrophils and enhance their phagocytic activity, a process that is dependent on cell-cell contacts [299, 300]. This indicates that MSCs are a promising candidate for the treatment of neutropenia. Moreover, Ou et al. have shown that MSC-derived apoptotic vesicles can ameliorate multiple organ dysfunction and improve survival in sepsis. Mechanistically, MSC-derived apoptotic vesicles mainly accumulate in the bone marrow via electrostatic charge interactions with positively charged neutrophil extracellular traps, switch neutrophils NETosis to apoptosis via the FasL-activated Fas pathway, suggesting that cell death is associated with disease development and therapy [300].

Apoptotic vesicles-MSC in antigen presentation

The immunomodulatory properties exhibited by EVs are of great importance as they significantly contribute to the facilitation of antigen presentation, a pivotal component of the adaptive immune response. Research has shown that EVs play a role in promoting antigen presentation via direct and cross-presentation mechanisms [301]. Indeed, apoptotic EVs possess the capability to modulate the process of antigen presentation. The internalization of MSC-ABs by DCs, in a manner comparable to the original cell, has been demonstrated to have the potential to modify their antigen-presenting functions. Notably, EVs originating from apoptotic lymphoblasts have been proven to reduce immune responses by suppressing MHC class II molecules on DCs [302].

Table 2 Summary of studies on the role of MSC-ABs in multiple pathophysiological settings

Autophagy and MSC-based inflammation and repair modulation

In the context of cytokines and growth factors released by MSCs, EVs may be highly concentrated in the supernatant. EVs have been widely utilized as delivery vehicles for many years due to their targeting capabilities, extended circulation time, and ability to overcome natural barriers [253, 254]. As mentioned, classical EVs, consisting of exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies, demonstrate variations in size and the process of their generation. The correlation between the genesis of EVs and the cellular processes linked to autophagy exhibits a multifaceted and varied nature. The ability of EVs to serve as regulators of autophagy and the transfer of autophagic constituents to recipient cells suggest a potential reliance on the structural integrity of lipid rafts [307, 308]. Moreover, the regulation of autophagy could potentially impact not only the number of EVs but also their composition, thereby significantly shaping the ultimate pro-tumorigenic or anti-cancer outcomes of autophagy regulators [309]. Autophagy, also referred to as autophagocytosis, is a fundamental process occurring in most tissues to maintain cellular homeostasis. It can be influenced by stress factors and various immunoregulatory signaling molecules [310]. Moreover, autophagy serves as an inherent and evolutionarily conserved mechanism of cellular degradation that is essential for eliminating unnecessary or impaired components. Besides, it is integral in orchestrating antigen presentation, maintaining lymphocyte homeostasis, and modulating cytokine generation [242]. On the other hand, autophagy modulators influence the content of important signaling molecules in ABs [309]. Impaired autophagy, also operating as a form of type II programmed cell death, may potentially increase the susceptibility of individuals to tumor formation. Research has shown that autophagy provides recyclable materials to support cellular sustenance, which complicates the distinction between “cell death with autophagy” and “cell death by autophagy” [310, 311]. Autophagy, recognized as a process of intracellular self-regulation, is believed to exert a substantial influence on the self-renewal, pluripotency, and differentiation of various categories of stem cells [312]. Notably, the interaction between intrinsic autophagy and the secretion of oxidants has been identified as a mechanism by which MSCs limit the growth of internalized bacteria. Consequently, the use of “conditioned” autologous or heterologous MSCs, or “engineered” MSCs with enhanced autophagic activity, holds significant promise for advancing MSC-based immunotherapy [105].

Moreover, autophagy modulators influence the content of important signaling molecules in ABs [309]. The induction of autophagy is of great significance, as it plays a crucial role in enhancing MSC-mediated immunomodulation against neurological disorders by facilitating the clearance of ABs [313]. Notably, Dang and colleagues provided compelling evidence of autophagy’s role in MSC functionality, highlighting the mechanistic induction of BECN1/Beclin 1 expression during their use in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [134]. On the other hand, the suppression of autophagy may be facilitated by the downregulation of Beclin 1, leading to an increase in prostaglandin E2 production, ultimately augmenting the therapeutic effectiveness of MSCs. In the same direction, Xia et al.. have outlined that MSC-EVs play a role in facilitating angiogenesis following an ischemic stroke through the possible suppression of autophagy, a process that partly relies on the activation of STAT3 [314]. Recent studies have identified additional categories of EVs, including autophagic EVs, defined by a mostly theoretical nature and a lack of total exclusivity among them [239, 241]. Autophagy significantly impacts the genesis and excretion processes of EVs. The autophagosome is capable of fusing with various endosomes, resulting in its release as autophagic EVs [239]. A study by Ahrabi and colleagues showed that EVs derived from autophagic MSCs can reduce inflammation and the accumulation of extracellular matrix in damaged renal tissue. Therefore, there is a potential for these EVs to be used as a therapeutic approach for treating renal fibrosis in the future [308].

Conclusion and future perspective

Over the last forty years, there has been a substantial amount of research carried out on MSCs resulting in the identification of their therapeutic potential. It is widely agreed upon that the immunotherapeutic capacity of infused MSCs is not solely reliant on their intrinsic characteristics, but rather necessitates the active involvement of other immune/non-immune cells, such as regulatory T cells and endothelial cells, which also subsequently facilitate tissue repair and regeneration. Additionally, the clearance mechanisms carried out by MSCs may enhance their therapeutic effects. In the meantime, the ultimate fate of administered MSCs continues to present as a substantial unresolved issue, despite their widespread application in clinical settings. As indicated in existing literature, the initial stage of immunotherapeutic action derived from MSCs encompasses intricate and multifaceted intercellular dialogues, whereas in the subsequent phase, MSCs have the capability to actively engage in programmed cell death and discharge ABs.

The formation of ABs as extracellular vesicles derived from apoptotic cells is a significant and efficient process. However, their use as carriers remains limited due to their variable sizes, complex contents, potential pro-apoptotic effects, and rapid clearance by phagocytes [291, 315, 316]. In addition to their enhanced production efficiency, ABs offer the advantage of being more manageable and scalable in production processes, thanks to a better understanding of cell apoptosis compared to the mechanisms involved in the formation of exosomes or microvesicles [264, 317,318,319,320]. Furthermore, because exosomes and ABs follow distinct biogenetic pathways, ABs exhibit a higher presence of cytomembrane-embedded protein complexes, which may enhance targeted delivery processes. On the other hand, the superior efficiency in loading components into ABs is linked to the natural encapsulation of molecules within ABs [316, 319,320,321,322]. Of importance, the existence of markers such as “find me” and “eat me” on the exterior of ABs aids in the precise recognition and engulfment by phagocytes [291, 315, 316]. A limited number of studies have concentrated on improving the targeting potential of apoptotic vesicles by investigating surface modification techniques or engineering strategies to enhance specificity for targeted cell or tissue delivery, potentially transforming drug delivery systems [316, 319, 320, 322,323,324]. For example, Dou et al.. have formulated chimeric ABs that are equipped with a natural membrane and a modular delivery system designed for the purpose of modulating inflammatory responses [322].

Therefore, it has been commonly noted that exogenous MSCs often undergo apoptosis following infusion. This phenomenon is regarded as a novel mechanism that significantly contributes to the therapeutic benefits observed in MSCs transplantation [120]. As supported by available evidence, this series of events is a crucial prerequisite for maintaining the immunoregulatory properties of MSCs and may be linked to the prediction of clinical responses. Apoptosis predominantly elicits tolerance, a process thought to underlie immunoparalysis. The development of immunoparalysis seems to be influenced by the nature and concentration of specific ligands, while tolerance may be an intrinsic feature. Research has shown that components of the innate immune system can trigger either trained immunity or tolerance-based immunity, independent of adaptive immune cells. Hence, the modulation of the immune response by apoptotic MSCs occurs through a series of sequential actions. The sequence of steps involves the internalization of apoptotic MSCs by phagocytic cells, reprogramming of their functionality, and modulation of specific intracellular signaling pathways. These mechanisms are facilitated by the innate functional plasticity of immunocytes and result in the enhancement of the host’s immune regulatory networks, which is associated with the long-term therapeutic efficacy of infused MSCs [53]. By identifying the receptors and signaling pathways that govern the functional fate of immunocytes, these discoveries have the potential to enable the differentiation and continuous regeneration of a reservoir of memory-like immunocytes. Such developments could have significant implications for host responsiveness.

Existing evidence substantiates the notion that the death of MSCs is likely to be triggered by a variety of complex mechanisms as outlined in this manuscript, including cellular cytotoxicity and activation of the complement system, both of which have a limited impact and could occur simultaneously. Additionally, the condition of the tissue stroma may provide insights into the induction of caspase-dependent apoptosis in MSCs [142]. It has been clarified that a strong cytotoxic reaction to MSCs, along with elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, may serve as reliable indicators for identifying individuals suitable for MSC infusion. Furthermore, in cases involving immunological complications and impaired inflammatory resolution, a discrepancy can occur in the abundance and effectiveness of cytokines, as varying cytokine concentrations may lead to different outcomes [325]. This disparity may explain the inconsistent findings regarding the influence of MSC infusions in patients suffering from the same conditions. As a result, the prediction of clinical response and the therapeutic effectiveness of transplanted MSCs depend on multiple factors, some of which may be influenced by the specific disease condition and the route of administration. In this regard, the beneficial aspects of infused apoptotic MSCs in the disease setting may be related to the specific inactivation method (programmed cell death) and the distinct homing niche characterized by a diverse array of hematopoietic cell types with efferocytic capacity [48, 58, 149, 282, 304, 326]. Going forward, the emphasis in forthcoming clinical trials should transition from merely selecting the most suitable population of MSCs to identifying the specific patients or diseases that are most predisposed to positively responding to MSC therapy, enhancing the MSC product, and formulating a treatment centered on the functional aspects of MSCs.

To summarize, MSCs possess the capacity to be prompted to release their secretome, which comprises extracellular vesicles, in response to signals present in their local microenvironment. These biologically active molecules play a pivotal role in expediting tissue healing by restraining stress reactions and programmed cell death. Subsequently, MSC-derived apoptotic bodies play an important role in the maintenance of tissue and organ homeostasis and in immune modulation in a wide variety of diseases. It is noteworthy that the characteristics of MSC-ABs can be modified through ex vivo/in vitro priming of MSCs, which carries extensive implications for the efficient translation of cell-based therapies and has been embraced as an attractive approach to augment the therapeutic target profile of MSCs [291, 322, 325, 327]. This might encompass the integration of cytokines, pretreatment with probiotics, introduction of genetic modifications, drug delivery systems, and other strategies. A key objective in expanding the use and impact of apoptotic body-MSCs, along with advancing treatments involving nanoparticles and drugs, is to explore the potential of apoptotic bodies as carriers for pharmaceutical delivery in various preclinical contexts beyond the current research scope. Consequently, regulating the apoptotic status of MSCs and ABs could significantly enhance the efficiency of MSCs in biomanufacturing and biotherapeutics for clinical applications.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article. This is a review article. Data sharing not applicable – no new data generated. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Abbreviations

ABs:

Apoptotic bodies

APC:

Antigen-presenting cells

AMPs:

Antimicrobial peptides and proteins

CCR2:

C-C chemokine receptor type 2

CCL:

C-C chemokine ligand

COX2:

Cyclooxygenase 2

CTL:

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte

DC:

Dendritic cell

ECs:

Endothelial cells

EVs:

Extracellular vesicles

FasL:

Fas ligand

HLA:

Human leukocyte antigen

HSCs:

Hepatic stellate cells

ICAM-1:

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1

IDO:

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

IFN-γ:

Interferon gamma

IL:

Interleukin

KCs:

Kupffer cells

KLF6:

Kruppel-like factor 6

MCP-1:

Chemoattractant protein-1

MM:

multiple myeloma

MMP 13:

Matrix metalloproteinase 13

MQs:

Macrophages

MRs:

Mannose receptors

MSCs:

Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells

NETosis:

Excessive extracellular traps

NFκB:

Nuclear Factor Kappa B

NK:

Natural killer cell

NO:

Nitric oxide

PD-L:

Programmed death ligand 1

PGE2:

Prostaglandin E2

PS:

Phosphatidylserine

PTPN22:

Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor 22

Rab7:

Ras-related protein 7

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

S1PR5:

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor type 5

SLE:

Systemic lupus erythematosus

SRs:

Scavenger receptors

T2D:

Type 2 diabetes

TFEB:

Transcription factor EB

TGF-β:

Transforming growth factor beta

TLR:

Toll-like receptor

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

TSG-6:

TNF-α induced gene/protein-6

VCAM-1:

Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1

References

  1. Leibacher J, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells undergo apoptosis and fragmentation after intravenous application in immune-competent mice. Cytotherapy. 2017;19(1):61–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eliopoulos N, et al. Allogeneic marrow stromal cells are immune rejected by MHC class I- and class II-mismatched recipient mice. Blood. 2005;106(13):4057–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rong X, et al. Antler stem cell-conditioned medium stimulates regenerative wound healing in rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong H, et al. Dental follicle stem cells rescue the regenerative capacity of inflamed rat dental pulp through a paracrine pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jin L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate myocardial fibrosis in diabetic cardiomyopathy via the secretion of prostaglandin E2. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chugh RM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy ameliorates metabolic dysfunction and restores fertility in a PCOS mouse model through interleukin-10. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Spaggiari GM, Moretta L. Mesenchymal stem cell-natural killer cell interactions. In: Hayat M (eds) Stem cells and Cancer Stem cells, volume 4: therapeutic applications in Disease and Injury. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht; 2012. pp. 217–24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-94-007-2828-8_19

  8. Moll G, et al. Are therapeutic human mesenchymal stromal cells compatible with human blood? Stem Cells. 2012;30(7):1565–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ifrim DC, et al. Trained immunity or tolerance: opposing functional programs induced in human monocytes after engagement of various pattern recognition receptors. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(4):534–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Quintin J, et al. Candida albicans infection affords protection against reinfection via functional reprogramming of monocytes. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12(2):223–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinnijenhuis J, et al. Bacille Calmette-Guerin induces NOD2-dependent nonspecific protection from reinfection via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(43):17537–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ng J, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells facilitate neutrophil-trained immunity by reprogramming hematopoietic stem cells. J Innate Immun. 2023;15(1):765–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hole CR, et al. Induction of memory-like dendritic cell responses in vivo. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2955.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lachmandas E, et al. Microbial stimulation of different toll-like receptor signalling pathways induces diverse metabolic programmes in human monocytes. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keating ST, et al. The Set7 lysine methyltransferase regulates plasticity in oxidative phosphorylation necessary for trained Immunity Induced by β-Glucan. Cell Rep. 2020;31(3):107548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Keating ST, et al. Rewiring of glucose metabolism defines trained immunity induced by oxidized low-density lipoprotein. J Mol Med (Berl). 2020;98(6):819–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Verma D, et al. Anti-mycobacterial activity correlates with altered DNA methylation pattern in immune cells from BCG-vaccinated subjects. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yao Y, et al. Induction of Autonomous Memory Alveolar macrophages requires T cell help and is critical to trained immunity. Cell. 2018;175(6):1634–e165017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Machiels B, et al. A gammaherpesvirus provides protection against allergic asthma by inducing the replacement of resident alveolar macrophages with regulatory monocytes. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(12):1310–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cirovic B, et al. BCG vaccination in humans elicits trained immunity via the hematopoietic progenitor compartment. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(2):322–e3345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaufmann E, et al. BCG educates hematopoietic stem cells to Generate Protective Innate immunity against tuberculosis. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):176–e19019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Novakovic B, et al. β-Glucan reverses the epigenetic state of LPS-Induced Immunological Tolerance. Cell. 2016;167(5):1354–e136814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Roquilly A, et al. Alveolar macrophages are epigenetically altered after inflammation, leading to long-term lung immunoparalysis. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(6):636–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arts RJW, et al. Immunometabolic pathways in BCG-Induced trained immunity. Cell Rep. 2016;17(10):2562–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Foster SL, Hargreaves DC, Medzhitov R. Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature. 2007;447(7147):972–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weizman OE, et al. Mouse cytomegalovirus-experienced ILC1s acquire a memory response dependent on the viral glycoprotein m12. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(8):1004–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown GD, et al. Dectin-1 mediates the biological effects of beta-glucans. J Exp Med. 2003;197(9):1119–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu PS, et al. α-ketoglutarate orchestrates macrophage activation through metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(9):985–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moorlag S, et al. BCG Vaccination induces long-term functional reprogramming of human neutrophils. Cell Rep. 2020;33(7):108387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lampropoulou V, et al. Itaconate Links Inhibition of Succinate dehydrogenase with macrophage metabolic remodeling and regulation of inflammation. Cell Metab. 2016;24(1):158–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Heng Y, et al. Systemic administration of β-glucan induces immune training in microglia. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. El Gazzar M, et al. Dynamic and selective nucleosome repositioning during endotoxin tolerance. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(2):1259–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McCall CE, et al. Epigenetics, bioenergetics, and microRNA coordinate gene-specific reprogramming during acute systemic inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;90(3):439–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Koeken VA, et al. BCG vaccination in humans inhibits systemic inflammation in a sex-dependent manner. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(10):5591–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bekkering S, et al. In Vitro Experimental Model of trained innate immunity in human primary monocytes. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2016;23(12):926–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Dos Santos JC, et al. β-Glucan-Induced trained immunity protects against Leishmania braziliensis infection: a crucial role for IL-32. Cell Rep. 2019;28(10):2659–e26726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kawanishi N, et al. Exercise attenuates M1 macrophages and CD8 + T cells in the adipose tissue of obese mice. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(9):1684–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang H, et al. Pre-operative exercise therapy triggers anti-inflammatory trained immunity of Kupffer cells through metabolic reprogramming. Nat Metab. 2021;3(6):843–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Murugathasan M, et al. Moderate exercise induces trained immunity in macrophages. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2023;325(2):C429–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li X, et al. IFNγ and TNFα synergistically induce apoptosis of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells via the induction of nitric oxide. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Slama Y et al. The dual role of mesenchymal stem cells in Cancer Pathophysiology: Pro-tumorigenic effects versus therapeutic potential. Int J Mol Sci, 2023. 24(17).

  42. Kim M, et al. Exosomes from IL-1β-Primed mesenchymal stem cells inhibited IL-1β- and TNF-α-Mediated inflammatory responses in osteoarthritic SW982 cells. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2021;18(4):525–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Colombini A, et al. Inflammatory priming with IL-1β promotes the immunomodulatory behavior of adipose derived stem cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1000879.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen Z, et al. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha synergistically enhance the immunosuppressive capacity of human umbilical-cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells by increasing PD-L1 expression. World J Stem Cells. 2023;15(8):787–806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. de Pedro M et al. IFN-Gamma and TNF-Alpha as a Priming Strategy to enhance the Immunomodulatory Capacity of Secretomes from Menstrual blood-derived stromal cells. Int J Mol Sci, 2021. 22(22).

  46. Ding Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells primed by inflammatory cytokines alleviate psoriasis-like inflammation via the TSG-6-neutrophil axis. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(11):996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rashedi I, et al. TLR3 or TLR4 activation enhances mesenchymal stromal cell-mediated Treg induction via Notch Signaling. Stem Cells. 2017;35(1):265–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pang SHM, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell apoptosis is required for their therapeutic function. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Gonçalves FDC, et al. Membrane particles generated from mesenchymal stromal cells modulate immune responses by selective targeting of pro-inflammatory monocytes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Di Tinco R, et al. Role of PD-L1 in licensing immunoregulatory function of dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Min H, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells reprogram monocytes and macrophages with processing bodies. Stem Cells. 2021;39(1):115–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mahmoudi M, et al. Cross talk between mesenchymal Stem/Stromal cells and innate immunocytes concerning Lupus Disease. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2022;18(8):2781–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hoseinzadeh A, et al. Modulation of mesenchymal stem cells-mediated adaptive Immune Effectors’ repertoire in the recovery of systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2023;19(2):322–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chatterjee D, et al. Role of gamma-secretase in human umbilical-cord derived mesenchymal stem cell mediated suppression of NK cell cytotoxicity. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Spaggiari GM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit natural killer-cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production: role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and prostaglandin E2. Blood. 2008;111(3):1327–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Huynh ML, Fadok VA, Henson PM. Phosphatidylserine-dependent ingestion of apoptotic cells promotes TGF-beta1 secretion and the resolution of inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(1):41–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Bian SY, et al. [Mesenchymal stem cells release membrane microparticles in the process of apoptosis]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2012;20(2):453–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Galleu A et al. Apoptosis in mesenchymal stromal cells induces in vivo recipient-mediated immunomodulation. Sci Transl Med, 2017. 9(416).

  59. Chen Y, et al. Recruitment of endogenous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells towards injured liver. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14(6b):1494–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cheung TS, et al. Apoptotic mesenchymal stromal cells induce prostaglandin E2 in monocytes: implications for the monitoring of mesenchymal stromal cell activity. Haematologica. 2019;104(10):e438–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang S, et al. Internalization of apoptotic cells during efferocytosis requires Mertk-mediated calcium influx. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(6):391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Rieu Q et al. Pleiotropic Roles of Scavenger Receptors in circadian retinal phagocytosis: a new function for lysosomal SR-B2/LIMP-2 at the RPE Cell Surface. Int J Mol Sci, 2022. 23(7).

  63. Kourtzelis I, et al. DEL-1 promotes macrophage efferocytosis and clearance of inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(1):40–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tao H, et al. Macrophage SR-BI mediates efferocytosis via Src/PI3K/Rac1 signaling and reduces atherosclerotic lesion necrosis. J Lipid Res. 2015;56(8):1449–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Yin C, Heit B. Cellular responses to the efferocytosis of apoptotic cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12.

  66. Yin C, et al. Rab17 mediates differential antigen sorting following efferocytosis and phagocytosis. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(12):e2529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. N AG, et al. Apoptotic cells promote their own clearance and immune tolerance through activation of the nuclear receptor LXR. Immunity. 2009;31(2):245–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Roszer T, et al. Autoimmune kidney disease and impaired engulfment of apoptotic cells in mice with macrophage peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma or retinoid X receptor alpha deficiency. J Immunol. 2011;186(1):621–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mukundan L, et al. PPAR-delta senses and orchestrates clearance of apoptotic cells to promote tolerance. Nat Med. 2009;15(11):1266–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kiss RS, et al. Apoptotic cells induce a phosphatidylserine-dependent homeostatic response from phagocytes. Curr Biol. 2006;16(22):2252–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Yurdagul A Jr., et al. Macrophage metabolism of apoptotic cell-derived arginine promotes continual efferocytosis and resolution of Injury. Cell Metab. 2020;31(3):518–e53310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Chow L, et al. Antibacterial activity of human mesenchymal stem cells mediated directly by constitutively secreted factors and indirectly by activation of innate immune effector cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9(2):235–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Alcayaga-Miranda F, Cuenca J, Khoury M. Antimicrobial activity of mesenchymal stem cells: current status and New perspectives of Antimicrobial peptide-based therapies. Front Immunol. 2017;8.

  74. Gonzalez-Rey E, et al. Human adult stem cells derived from adipose tissue protect against experimental colitis and sepsis. Gut. 2009;58(7):929–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Mei SH, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation while enhancing bacterial clearance and improving survival in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(8):1047–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Monsel A, et al. Therapeutic effects of Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles in severe pneumonia in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(3):324–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Krasnodembskaya A, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells reduce mortality and bacteremia in gram-negative sepsis in mice in part by enhancing the phagocytic activity of blood monocytes. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302(10):L1003–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Sutton MT, et al. Antimicrobial properties of mesenchymal stem cells: therapeutic potential for cystic fibrosis infection, and treatment. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:p5303048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Brandau S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells augment the anti-bacterial activity of neutrophil granulocytes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e106903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Yamaguchi Y, et al. Identification of multiple novel epididymis-specific beta-defensin isoforms in humans and mice. J Immunol. 2002;169(5):2516–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Murakami M, et al. Postsecretory processing generates multiple cathelicidins for enhanced topical antimicrobial defense. J Immunol. 2004;172(5):3070–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Harman RM, et al. Antimicrobial peptides secreted by equine mesenchymal stromal cells inhibit the growth of bacteria commonly found in skin wounds. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Krasnodembskaya A, et al. Antibacterial effect of human mesenchymal stem cells is mediated in part from secretion of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Stem Cells. 2010;28(12):2229–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Alcayaga-Miranda F, et al. Combination therapy of menstrual derived mesenchymal stem cells and antibiotics ameliorates survival in sepsis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Gombart AF. The vitamin D-antimicrobial peptide pathway and its role in protection against infection. Future Microbiol. 2009;4(9):1151–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kim BJ et al. The effect of calcipotriol on the expression of human beta defensin-2 and LL-37 in cultured human keratinocytes. Clin Dev Immunol, 2009. 2009: p. 645898.

  87. Gupta N, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance survival and bacterial clearance in murine Escherichia coli pneumonia. Thorax. 2012;67(6):533–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Johnson V, et al. Activated mesenchymal stem cells interact with antibiotics and host Innate Immune responses to control chronic bacterial infections. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Sung DK, et al. Antibacterial effect of mesenchymal stem cells against Escherichia coli is mediated by secretion of beta- defensin- 2 via toll- like receptor 4 signalling. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18(3):424–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Yagi H, et al. Antimicrobial activity of mesenchymal stem cells against Staphylococcus aureus. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Yamamuro Y, et al. Combined adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell and antibiotic therapy can effectively treat periprosthetic joint infection in rats. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Bonfield TL, et al. Donor-defined mesenchymal stem cell antimicrobial potency against nontuberculous mycobacterium. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2021;10(8):1202–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Sutton MT et al. Mesenchymal stem cell Soluble mediators and cystic fibrosis. J Stem Cell Res Ther, 2017. 7(9).

  94. Bonfield T, et al. Cell based therapy aides in infection and inflammation resolution in the murine model of cystic fibrosis lung disease. Stem Cell Discovery. 2013;3:139–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Goldstein BD, et al. Chronic asthma and mesenchymal stem cells: Hyaluronan and airway remodeling. J Inflamm (Lond). 2017;14:18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Perlee D, et al. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells modify lung immunity and improve Antibacterial Defense in Pneumosepsis caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(8):785–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Rabani R et al. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance NOX2-dependent reactive oxygen species production and bacterial killing in macrophages during sepsis. Eur Respir J, 2018. 51(4).

  98. Sánchez-Abarca LI, et al. Uptake and delivery of antigens by mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotherapy. 2013;15(6):673–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Chan JL, et al. Antigen-presenting property of mesenchymal stem cells occurs during a narrow window at low levels of interferon-gamma. Blood. 2006;107(12):4817–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Hoseinzadeh A, et al. A new generation of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells differentially trained by immunoregulatory probiotics in a lupus microenvironment. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Tolstova T, et al. The effect of TLR3 priming conditions on MSC immunosuppressive properties. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Yang K, et al. Functional RIG-I-like receptors control the survival of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4(12):e967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Hwang S et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells primed by toll-like receptors 3 and 4 enhanced anti-inflammatory effects against LPS-Induced macrophages via Extracellular vesicles. Int J Mol Sci, 2023. 24(22).

  104. Kim HS, et al. Implication of NOD1 and NOD2 for the differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):e15369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Khan A, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells internalize Mycobacterium tuberculosis through scavenger receptors and restrict bacterial growth through autophagy. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Xu J, et al. High density lipoprotein cholesterol promotes the proliferation of bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells via binding scavenger receptor-B type I and activation of PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK1/2 pathways. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;371(1–2):55–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Costela Ruiz VJ, et al. Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and their phagocytic capacity. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26(1):178–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Zhang Z, et al. Clearance of apoptotic cells by mesenchymal stem cells contributes to immunosuppression via PGE2. EBioMedicine. 2019;45:341–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Pajarinen J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in the aseptic loosening of total joint replacements. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(4):1195–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Tso GH, et al. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells modulates mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation to enhance IL-17 and RANKL expression on CD4 + T cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28(5):939–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Okafor CC, et al. Particulate endocytosis mediates biological responses of human mesenchymal stem cells to titanium wear debris. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(3):461–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Kojima Y, Weissman IL, Leeper NJ. The role of efferocytosis in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2017;135(5):476–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Quarato ER, et al. Efferocytosis by bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells disrupts osteoblastic differentiation via mitochondrial remodeling. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(7):428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Morandi F, et al. Immunogenicity of human mesenchymal stem cells in HLA-class I-restricted T-cell responses against viral or tumor-associated antigens. Stem Cells. 2008;26(5):1275–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Lee CS, et al. Boosting apoptotic cell clearance by Colonic epithelial cells attenuates inflammation in vivo. Immunity. 2016;44(4):807–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Juncadella IJ, et al. Apoptotic cell clearance by bronchial epithelial cells critically influences airway inflammation. Nature. 2013;493(7433):547–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Le TM, et al. Ex vivo induction of apoptotic mesenchymal stem cell by high hydrostatic pressure. Stem Cell Reviews Rep. 2021;17(2):662–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Luk F, et al. Inactivated mesenchymal stem cells maintain Immunomodulatory Capacity. Stem Cells Dev. 2016;25(18):1342–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Reijnders TDY, et al. Effect of mesenchymal stem cells on the host response in severe community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2024;79(11):1086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Noronha NdC, et al. Priming approaches to improve the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Liang W, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as a double-edged sword in tumor growth: focusing on MSC-derived cytokines. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2021;26(1):3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Akiyama K, et al. Mesenchymal-stem-cell-induced immunoregulation involves FAS-ligand-/FAS-mediated T cell apoptosis. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(5):544–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. de Witte SFH, et al. Immunomodulation by therapeutic mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) is triggered through phagocytosis of MSC by Monocytic cells. Stem Cells. 2018;36(4):602–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Yuan QL, Zhang YG, Chen Q. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-Derived extracellular vesicles: potential therapeutics as MSC Trophic mediators in Regenerative Medicine. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2020;303(6):1735–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Alfaifi M, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2018;68(6):1272–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Lee RH, et al. Intravenous hMSCs improve myocardial infarction in mice because cells embolized in lung are activated to secrete the anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(1):54–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Rasmusson I, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells fail to trigger effector functions of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82(4):887–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Spaggiari GM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-natural killer cell interactions: evidence that activated NK cells are capable of killing MSCs, whereas MSCs can inhibit IL-2-induced NK-cell proliferation. Blood. 2006;107(4):1484–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Gerlach BD, et al. Efferocytosis induces macrophage proliferation to help resolve tissue injury. Cell Metab. 2021;33(12):2445–e24638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Zhang Y et al. Efferocytosis in multisystem diseases (review). Mol Med Rep, 2022. 25(1).

  131. Ye Q, et al. Apoptotic extracellular vesicles alleviate Pg-LPS induced inflammatory responses of macrophages via AMPK/SIRT1/NF-κB pathway and inhibit osteoclast formation. J Periodontol. 2022;93(11):1738–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Romecín PA, et al. Robust in Vitro and in vivo immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties of Inducible Caspase-9-mediated apoptotic mesenchymal Stromal/Stem cell. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022;11(1):88–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Dang S, et al. Autophagy promotes apoptosis of mesenchymal stem cells under inflammatory microenvironment. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Dang S, et al. Autophagy regulates the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Autophagy. 2014;10(7):1301–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Krampera M, et al. Role for interferon-gamma in the immunomodulatory activity of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24(2):386–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Zappia E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis inducing T-cell anergy. Blood. 2005;106(5):1755–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Li Y, Lin F. Mesenchymal stem cells are injured by complement after their contact with serum. Blood. 2012;120(17):3436–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Soland MA, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells engineered to inhibit complement-mediated damage. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e60461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Xiao K, et al. Membrane complement regulatory protein reduces the damage of transplanting autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by suppressing the activation of complement. Injury. 2017;48(10):2089–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Tu Z, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit complement activation by secreting factor H. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19(11):1803–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Brehm MA, et al. Overcoming current limitations in humanized mouse research. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(2):S125–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Bartosh TJ, et al. Dynamic compaction of human mesenchymal stem/precursor cells into spheres self-activates caspase-dependent IL1 signaling to enhance secretion of modulators of inflammation and immunity (PGE2, TSG6, and STC1). Stem Cells. 2013;31(11):2443–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Ko JH, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells precondition lung monocytes/macrophages to produce tolerance against allo- and autoimmunity in the eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(1):158–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Giallongo C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) regulate activation of Granulocyte-Like myeloid derived suppressor cells (G-MDSC) in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Merino A, et al. Membrane particles derived from mesenchymal stromal cells as a novel cell free therapy for immunomodulation and regeneration. Cytotherapy. 2020;22:S87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Liebold I, et al. Apoptotic cell identity induces distinct functional responses to IL-4 in efferocytic macrophages. Science. 2024;384(6691):eabo7027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Yoon YS, et al. PPARγ activation following apoptotic cell instillation promotes resolution of lung inflammation and fibrosis via regulation of efferocytosis and proresolving cytokines. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8(5):1031–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Liang Z, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells regulate M1/M2 macrophage polarization in mice with Immune Thrombocytopenia. Stem Cells Dev. 2023;32(21–22):703–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Wang M, et al. Calcium phosphate altered the cytokine secretion of macrophages and influenced the homing of mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(29):4765–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Shimamura Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells exert renoprotection via extracellular vesicle-mediated modulation of M2 macrophages and spleen-kidney network. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Kojima Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells cultured under hypoxic conditions had a greater therapeutic effect on mice with liver cirrhosis compared to those cultured under normal oxygen conditions. Regen Ther. 2019;11:269–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Luo XY, et al. Transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells attenuates liver fibrosis in mice by regulating macrophage subtypes. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Li C, et al. Hippo Signaling Controls NLR Family Pyrin Domain containing 3 activation and governs immunoregulation of mesenchymal stem cells in Mouse Liver Injury. Hepatology. 2019;70(5):1714–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Sheng M, et al. CD47-Mediated Hedgehog/SMO/GLI1 signaling promotes mesenchymal stem cell immunomodulation in mouse liver inflammation. Hepatology. 2021;74(3):1560–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Zhang Y et al. Mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles alleviate traumatic hemorrhagic Shock Induced hepatic Injury via IL-10/PTPN22-Mediated M2 Kupffer Cell polarization. Front Immunol. 2022;12.

  156. Ohara M, et al. Extracellular vesicles from Amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in rats. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:3212643.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Tian S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes protect against liver fibrosis via delivering miR-148a to target KLF6/STAT3 pathway in macrophages. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Noronha NC, et al. Priming approaches to improve the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Aydin O, et al. The Proteomic effects of Pulsed focused Ultrasound on Tumor microenvironments of murine melanoma and breast Cancer models. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(12):3232–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Palano MT, et al. The tumor innate immune microenvironment in prostate cancer: an overview of soluble factors and cellular effectors. Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2022;3(5):694–718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. Janji B, et al. Firing up the cold tumors by targeting Vps34. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9(1):1809936.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. He X, et al. Spontaneous apoptosis of cells in therapeutic stem cell preparation exert immunomodulatory effects through release of phosphatidylserine. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Eggenhofer E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells are short-lived and do not migrate beyond the lungs after intravenous infusion. Front Immunol. 2012;3:297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Preda MB, et al. Short lifespan of syngeneic transplanted MSC is a consequence of in vivo apoptosis and immune cell recruitment in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(6):566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Fiore E, et al. Involvement of hepatic macrophages in the antifibrotic effect of IGF-I-overexpressing mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Liu F, et al. MSC-secreted TGF-β regulates lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophage M2-like polarization via the Akt/FoxO1 pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Lin T, et al. Preconditioning of murine mesenchymal stem cells synergistically enhanced immunomodulation and osteogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Philipp D, et al. Preconditioning of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells highly strengthens their potential to promote IL-6-dependent M2b polarization. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Medina CB, et al. Metabolites released from apoptotic cells act as tissue messengers. Nature. 2020;580(7801):130–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Li M, et al. BMSC-Derived ApoEVs promote Craniofacial Bone Repair via ROS/JNK Signaling. J Dent Res. 2022;101(6):714–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Ma L, et al. Apoptotic extracellular vesicles are metabolized regulators nurturing the skin and hair. Bioact Mater. 2023;19:626–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Liu D, et al. Circulating apoptotic bodies maintain mesenchymal stem cell homeostasis and ameliorate osteopenia via transferring multiple cellular factors. Cell Res. 2018;28(9):918–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Ti D, et al. LPS-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cells modify macrophage polarization for resolution of chronic inflammation via exosome-shuttled let-7b. J Transl Med. 2015;13:308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Liu J, et al. Apoptotic bodies derived from mesenchymal stem cells promote cutaneous wound healing via regulating the functions of macrophages. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Li X, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived apoptotic bodies alleviate alveolar bone destruction by regulating osteoclast differentiation and function. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15(1):51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Kota DJ, et al. TSG-6 produced by hMSCs delays the onset of autoimmune diabetes by suppressing Th1 development and enhancing tolerogenicity. Diabetes. 2013;62(6):2048–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Chen L, et al. Paracrine factors of mesenchymal stem cells recruit macrophages and endothelial lineage cells and enhance wound healing. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(4):e1886.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. Chiossone L, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells induce Peculiar alternatively activated macrophages capable of dampening both innate and adaptive Immune responses. Stem Cells. 2016;34(7):1909–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Ravishankar B, et al. Tolerance to apoptotic cells is regulated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(10):3909–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Ravishankar B, et al. Marginal zone CD169 + macrophages coordinate apoptotic cell-driven cellular recruitment and tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(11):4215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Getts DR, et al. Tolerance induced by apoptotic antigen-coupled leukocytes is induced by PD-L1 + and IL-10-producing splenic macrophages and maintained by T regulatory cells. J Immunol. 2011;187(5):2405–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Blachère NE, Darnell RB, Albert ML. Apoptotic cells deliver processed antigen to dendritic cells for cross-presentation. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(6):e185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Williams CA, Harry RA, McLeod JD. Apoptotic cells induce dendritic cell-mediated suppression via interferon-gamma-induced IDO. Immunology. 2008;124(1):89–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Dick SA, et al. Three tissue resident macrophage subsets coexist across organs with conserved origins and life cycles. Sci Immunol. 2022;7(67):eabf7777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Ueffing K, et al. Conventional CD11c(high) dendritic cells are important for T cell priming during the initial phase of Plasmodium yoelii infection, but are dispensable at later time points. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1333.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. Miyake Y, et al. Critical role of macrophages in the marginal zone in the suppression of immune responses to apoptotic cell-associated antigens. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(8):2268–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. McGaha TL, et al. Marginal zone macrophages suppress innate and adaptive immunity to apoptotic cells in the spleen. Blood. 2011;117(20):5403–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Wang Z, et al. Use of the inhibitory effect of apoptotic cells on dendritic cells for graft survival via T-cell deletion and regulatory T cells. Am J Transpl. 2006;6(6):1297–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. Wang Z, et al. In situ-targeting of dendritic cells with donor-derived apoptotic cells restrains indirect allorecognition and ameliorates allograft vasculopathy. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4940.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  190. Morelli AE, et al. Internalization of circulating apoptotic cells by splenic marginal zone dendritic cells: dependence on complement receptors and effect on cytokine production. Blood. 2003;101(2):611–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Kraal G, Mebius R. New insights into the cell biology of the marginal zone of the spleen. Int Rev Cytol. 2006;250:175–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Bonnefoy F, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells play a major role in apoptotic leukocyte-induced immune modulation. J Immunol. 2011;186(10):5696–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Czernek L, Pęczek Ł, Düchler M. Small extracellular vesicles loaded with immunosuppressive miRNAs leads to an inhibition of dendritic cell maturation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2022;70(1):27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Verbovetski I, et al. Opsonization of apoptotic cells by autologous iC3b facilitates clearance by immature dendritic cells, down-regulates DR and CD86, and up-regulates CC chemokine receptor 7. J Exp Med. 2002;196(12):1553–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. Ip WK, Lau YL. Distinct maturation of, but not migration between, human monocyte-derived dendritic cells upon ingestion of apoptotic cells of early or late phases. J Immunol. 2004;173(1):189–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Sun E, et al. Allograft tolerance induced by donor apoptotic lymphocytes requires phagocytosis in the recipient. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(12):1258–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Qiu CH, et al. Novel subset of CD8{alpha}+ dendritic cells localized in the marginal zone is responsible for tolerance to cell-associated antigens. J Immunol. 2009;182(7):4127–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Tzelepis F, et al. Annexin1 regulates DC efferocytosis and cross-presentation during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(2):752–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Yatim N, et al. RIPK1 and NF-κB signaling in dying cells determines cross-priming of CD8⁺ T cells. Science. 2015;350(6258):328–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  200. Scott MJ, et al. CD40-CD154 interactions between macrophages and natural killer cells during sepsis are critical for macrophage activation and are not interferon gamma dependent. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;137(3):469–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  201. Nedvetzki S, et al. Reciprocal regulation of human natural killer cells and macrophages associated with distinct immune synapses. Blood. 2007;109(9):3776–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Bellora F, et al. The interaction of human natural killer cells with either unpolarized or polarized macrophages results in different functional outcomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(50):21659–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  203. Selmani Z, et al. HLA-G is a crucial immunosuppressive molecule secreted by adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Transplantation. 2009;87(9 Suppl):S62–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Lu Y, et al. TLR4 plays a crucial role in MSC-induced inhibition of NK cell function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464(2):541–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Wisgalla A, et al. Alterations of NK Cell phenotype during pregnancy in multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:907994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  206. Blanco B, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of bone marrow versus adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on NK cells: implications in the transplantation setting. Eur J Haematol. 2016;97(6):528–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Qu M, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells suppress NK cell recruitment and activation in PolyI:C-induced liver injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;466(2):173–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Petri RM, et al. Activated tissue-resident mesenchymal stromal cells regulate natural killer cell Immune and tissue-regenerative function. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9(3):985–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  209. Martinez VG, et al. Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha improves immunomodulation by dental mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  210. Cui R, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells acquire immunostimulatory capacity upon cross-talk with natural killer cells and might improve the NK cell function of immunocompromised patients. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  211. Abomaray F, et al. The effect of mesenchymal stromal cells derived from endometriotic lesions on natural killer cell function. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:612714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  212. Viel S, et al. TGF-β inhibits the activation and functions of NK cells by repressing the mTOR pathway. Sci Signal. 2016;9(415):ra19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Trotta R, et al. TGF-beta utilizes SMAD3 to inhibit CD16-mediated IFN-gamma production and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in human NK cells. J Immunol. 2008;181(6):3784–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  214. Smyth MJ, et al. CD4 + CD25 + T regulatory cells suppress NK cell-mediated immunotherapy of cancer. J Immunol. 2006;176(3):1582–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Liu W, et al. CCR4 mediated chemotaxis of regulatory T cells suppress the activation of T cells and NK cells via TGF-β pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;488(1):196–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. Zaiatz-Bittencourt V, Finlay DK, Gardiner CM. Canonical TGF-β signaling pathway represses human NK Cell Metabolism. J Immunol. 2018;200(12):3934–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. Slattery K et al. TGFβ drives NK cell metabolic dysfunction in human metastatic breast cancer. J Immunother Cancer, 2021. 9(2).

  218. Sotiropoulou PA, et al. Interactions between human mesenchymal stem cells and natural killer cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24(1):74–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. Consentius C, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells prevent Allostimulation in vivo and control checkpoints of Th1 priming: Migration of Human DC to Lymph Nodes and NK Cell activation. Stem Cells. 2015;33(10):3087–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  220. Castriconi R, et al. Transforming growth factor β1 inhibits expression of NKp30 and NKG2D receptors: consequences for the NK-mediated killing of dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(7):4120–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  221. Yu JJ, et al. IL15 promotes growth and invasion of endometrial stromal cells and inhibits killing activity of NK cells in endometriosis. Reproduction. 2016;152(2):151–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. Ishida N, et al. Cotransplantation of preactivated mesenchymal stem cells improves intraportal engraftment of islets by inhibiting liver natural killer cells in mice. Am J Transpl. 2019;19(10):2732–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  223. Pradier A, et al. Human bone marrow stromal cells and skin fibroblasts inhibit natural killer cell proliferation and cytotoxic activity. Cell Transpl. 2011;20(5):681–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  224. Dastagir N, Beal Z, Godwin J. Tissue origin of cytotoxic natural killer cells dictates their differential roles in mouse digit tip regeneration and progenitor cell survival. Stem Cell Rep. 2022;17(3):633–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  225. Liu XT, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase suppresses the cytotoxicity of 1 NK cells in response to ectopic endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis. Reproduction. 2018;156(5):397–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  226. Sarhan D et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells shape the MDS microenvironment by inducing suppressive monocytes that dampen NK cell function. JCI Insight, 2020. 5(5).

  227. Yang HL, et al. The crosstalk between endometrial stromal cells and macrophages impairs cytotoxicity of NK cells in endometriosis by secreting IL-10 and TGF-β. Reproduction. 2017;154(6):815–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  228. Evans JF, et al. Mouse aorta-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells contribute to and enhance the immune response of macrophage cells under inflammatory conditions. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6(1):56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  229. Ito T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell and islet co-transplantation promotes graft revascularization and function. Transplantation. 2010;89(12):1438–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. Götherström C, et al. Fetal and adult multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells are killed by different pathways. Cytotherapy. 2011;13(3):269–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. DelaRosa O, et al. Human adipose-derived stem cells impair natural killer cell function and exhibit low susceptibility to natural killer-mediated lysis. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21(8):1333–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. Kärre K. Natural killer cell recognition of missing self. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(5):477–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Poggi A, et al. Interaction between human NK cells and bone marrow stromal cells induces NK cell triggering: role of NKp30 and NKG2D receptors. J Immunol. 2005;175(10):6352–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. Poehlmann TG, et al. Inhibition of term decidual NK cell cytotoxicity by soluble HLA-G1. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2006;56(5–6):275–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. Waterman RS, et al. A new mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) paradigm: polarization into a pro-inflammatory MSC1 or an immunosuppressive MSC2 phenotype. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(4):e10088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  236. Hu CD, et al. Differential Immunomodulatory effects of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on natural killer cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28(14):933–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. Jiang L, et al. Determining the contents and cell origins of apoptotic bodies by flow cytometry. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  238. van Maanen JC, et al. A Combined Western and Bead-based multiplex platform to characterize Extracellular vesicles. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2023;29(11):493–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  239. Jeppesen DK, et al. Reassessment of Exosome Composition. Cell. 2019;177(2):428–e44518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  240. Quah BJ, et al. Bystander B cells rapidly acquire antigen receptors from activated B cells by membrane transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(11):4259–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  241. Eguchi T et al. Cell stress Induced Stressome Release including damaged membrane vesicles and extracellular HSP90 by prostate Cancer cells. Cells, 2020. 9(3).

  242. Sheta M et al. Extracellular vesicles: new classification and tumor immunosuppression. Biology (Basel), 2023. 12(1).

  243. Piening LM, Wachs RA. Matrix-bound nanovesicles: what are they and what do they do? Cells Tissues Organs. 2023;212(1):111–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  244. Théry C, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  245. Akers JC, et al. Biogenesis of extracellular vesicles (EV): exosomes, microvesicles, retrovirus-like vesicles, and apoptotic bodies. J Neurooncol. 2013;113(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  246. Kamerkar S, et al. Exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2017;546(7659):498–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  247. Florek M, et al. Autologous apoptotic cells preceding transplantation enhance survival in lethal murine graft-versus-host models. Blood. 2014;124(11):1832–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  248. Wu X, et al. Micro-vesicles derived from human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stromal cells mitigate renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats after cardiac death renal transplantation. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(2):1879–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Du T, et al. Microvesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchyme promote M2 macrophage polarization and ameliorate renal fibrosis following partial nephrectomy via hepatocyte growth factor. Hum Cell. 2021;34(4):1103–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  250. Yeh YT, et al. Rapid size-based isolation of Extracellular vesicles by three-dimensional Carbon Nanotube arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(11):13134–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  251. Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WC. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett. 2006;6(4):662–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  252. Huang J, et al. Effects of nanoparticle size on cellular uptake and liver MRI with polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4(12):7151–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  253. Lotfy A, AboQuella NM, Wang H. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes in clinical trials. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  254. Kou M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for immunomodulation and regeneration: a next generation therapeutic tool? Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(7):580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  255. Aoki K, et al. Coordinated changes in cell membrane and cytoplasm during maturation of apoptotic bleb. Mol Biol Cell. 2020;31(8):833–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  256. Poon IK, et al. Unexpected link between an antibiotic, pannexin channels and apoptosis. Nature. 2014;507(7492):329–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  257. Caruso S, Poon IKH. Apoptotic cell-derived extracellular vesicles: more than just debris. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1486.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  258. Zhang X, et al. Functional diversity of apoptotic vesicle subpopulations from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in tissue regeneration. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024;13(4):e12434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  259. Halicka HD, Bedner E, Darzynkiewicz Z. Segregation of RNA and separate packaging of DNA and RNA in apoptotic bodies during apoptosis. Exp Cell Res. 2000;260(2):248–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  260. Gatti S, et al. Microvesicles derived from human adult mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischaemia-reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2011;26(5):1474–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  261. Brock CK, et al. Stem cell proliferation is induced by apoptotic bodies from dying cells during epithelial tissue maintenance. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  262. Collino F, et al. AKI Recovery Induced by Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular vesicles carrying MicroRNAs. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(10):2349–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  263. Zhang X, et al. Proteomic analysis of MSC-derived apoptotic vesicles identifies Fas inheritance to ameliorate haemophilia a via activating platelet functions. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11(7):e12240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  264. Zheng C, et al. Apoptotic vesicles restore liver macrophage homeostasis to counteract type 2 diabetes. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10(7):e12109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  265. Haraszti RA, et al. High-resolution proteomic and lipidomic analysis of exosomes and microvesicles from different cell sources. J Extracell Vesicles. 2016;5:32570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  266. Kraynak CA, Yan DJ, Suggs LJ. Modulating inflammatory macrophages with an apoptotic body-inspired nanoparticle. Acta Biomater. 2020;108:250–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  267. Cheung TS, et al. Apoptosis in mesenchymal stromal cells activates an immunosuppressive secretome predicting clinical response in Crohn’s disease. Mol Ther. 2023;31(12):3531–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  268. Sordet O, et al. Specific involvement of caspases in the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. Blood. 2002;100(13):4446–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  269. Caruso S, et al. Defining the role of cytoskeletal components in the formation of apoptopodia and apoptotic bodies during apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2019;24(11–12):862–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  270. Reutelingsperger CP, van Heerde WL. Annexin V, the regulator of phosphatidylserine-catalyzed inflammation and coagulation during apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1997;53(6):527–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  271. Chono S, et al. Influence of particle size on drug delivery to rat alveolar macrophages following pulmonary administration of ciprofloxacin incorporated into liposomes. J Drug Target. 2006;14(8):557–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  272. Zhang W, et al. Engineered Cancer-Derived Small Extracellular vesicle-liposome hybrid delivery system for targeted treatment of breast Cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(13):16420–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  273. Mendt M, Rezvani K, Shpall E. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for clinical use. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2019;54(Suppl 2):789–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  274. Liu H, et al. Donor MSCs release apoptotic bodies to improve myocardial infarction via autophagy regulation in recipient cells. Autophagy. 2020;16(12):2140–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  275. Li Z, et al. Apoptotic vesicles activate autophagy in recipient cells to induce angiogenesis and dental pulp regeneration. Mol Ther. 2022;30(10):3193–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  276. Lei F, et al. Apoptotic vesicles rejuvenate mesenchymal stem cells via Rab7-mediated autolysosome formation and alleviate bone loss in aging mice. Nano Res. 2023;16(1):822–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  277. Dong J, Wu B, Tian W. Preparation of apoptotic extracellular vesicles from adipose tissue and their efficacy in promoting high-quality skin Wound Healing. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18:2923–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  278. Huang Z, et al. Apoptotic vesicles are required to repair DNA damage and suppress premature cellular senescence. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024;13(4):e12428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  279. Chen L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles protect against abdominal aortic aneurysm formation by inhibiting NET-induced ferroptosis. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55(5):939–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  280. Wang R, et al. Apoptotic vesicles ameliorate lupus and arthritis via phosphatidylserine-mediated modulation of T cell receptor signaling. Bioact Mater. 2023;25:472–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  281. Liu S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells prevent hypertrophic scar formation via inflammatory regulation when undergoing apoptosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(10):2648–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  282. Liu FB, Lin Q, Liu ZW. A study on the role of apoptotic human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in bleomycin-induced acute lung injury in rat models. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(5):969–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  283. Ye Q, et al. MSCs-derived apoptotic extracellular vesicles promote muscle regeneration by inducing Pannexin 1 channel-dependent creatine release by myoblasts. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15(1):7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  284. Zhang S, et al. Efferocytosis fuels requirements of fatty acid oxidation and the Electron Transport Chain to Polarize macrophages for tissue repair. Cell Metab. 2019;29(2):443–e4565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  285. Truman LA, et al. CX3CL1/fractalkine is released from apoptotic lymphocytes to stimulate macrophage chemotaxis. Blood. 2008;112(13):5026–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  286. Crean D, et al. Adenosine modulates NR4A Orphan Nuclear receptors to attenuate hyperinflammatory responses in monocytic cells. J Immunol. 2015;195(4):1436–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  287. Ipseiz N, et al. The nuclear receptor Nr4a1 mediates anti-inflammatory effects of apoptotic cells. J Immunol. 2014;192(10):4852–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  288. Yamaguchi H, et al. Immunosuppression via adenosine receptor activation by adenosine monophosphate released from apoptotic cells. Elife. 2014;3:e02172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  289. Baratin M, et al. Cell Zone Resident macrophages silently dispose of apoptotic cells in the Lymph Node. Immunity. 2017;47(2):349–e3625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  290. Sui B, et al. Apoptotic vesicular metabolism contributes to Organelle Assembly and safeguards Liver Homeostasis and Regeneration. Gastroenterology. 2024;167(2):343–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  291. Xin L, et al. In situ delivery of apoptotic bodies derived from mesenchymal stem cells via a hyaluronic acid hydrogel: a therapy for intrauterine adhesions. Bioact Mater. 2022;12:107–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  292. Tang H et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived apoptotic bodies: Biological functions and therapeutic potential. Cells, 2022. 11(23).

  293. Jiang D, et al. Suppression of neutrophil-mediated tissue Damage-A novel skill of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2016;34(9):2393–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  294. Salemme R, et al. The role of NETosis in systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Cell Immunol. 2019;1(2):33–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  295. Yu Y, Su K. Neutrophil Extracellular traps and systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2013;4.

  296. Frangou E, et al. An emerging role of neutrophils and NETosis in chronic inflammation and fibrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV): implications for the pathogenesis and treatment. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18(8):751–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  297. Denning NL, et al. DAMPs and NETs in Sepsis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  298. Mutua V, Gershwin LJ. A review of Neutrophil Extracellular traps (NETs) in Disease: potential Anti-NETs therapeutics. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021;61(2):194–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  299. Taghavi-Farahabadi M, et al. Evaluation of the effects of mesenchymal stem cells on neutrophils isolated from severe congenital neutropenia patients. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;83:106463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  300. Ou Q, et al. Electrostatic charge-mediated apoptotic vesicle Biodistribution attenuates Sepsis by switching Neutrophil NETosis to apoptosis. Small. 2022;18(20):e2200306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  301. Fang SB, et al. Plasma EVs display Antigen-presenting characteristics in patients with allergic Rhinitis and promote differentiation of Th2 cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12:710372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  302. Fehr EM, et al. Apoptotic-cell-derived membrane vesicles induce an alternative maturation of human dendritic cells which is disturbed in SLE. J Autoimmun. 2013;40:86–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  303. Sui B et al. Apoptotic Extracellular Vesicles (ApoEVs) Safeguard Liver Homeostasis and Regeneration via Assembling an ApoEV-Golgi Organelle. 2021.

  304. Sung PH, et al. Apoptotic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy protects against lung and kidney injury in sepsis syndrome caused by cecal ligation puncture in rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4(6):155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  305. Laing AG, et al. Immune modulation by apoptotic dental pulp stem cells in vivo. Immunotherapy. 2018;10(3):201–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  306. Wang J, et al. Apoptotic extracellular vesicles ameliorate multiple myeloma by restoring Fas-mediated apoptosis. ACS Nano. 2021;15(9):14360–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  307. Romenskaja D, Jonavičė U, Pivoriūnas A. Extracellular vesicles promote autophagy in human microglia through lipid raft-dependent mechanisms. Febs j. 2024;291(16):3706–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  308. Ahrabi B, et al. Autophagy-induced mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorated renal fibrosis in an in vitro model. Bioimpacts. 2023;13(5):359–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  309. Hanelova K, et al. Autophagy modulators influence the content of important signalling molecules in PS-positive extracellular vesicles. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  310. Lee Y, et al. Increased SCF/c-kit by hypoxia promotes autophagy of human placental chorionic plate-derived mesenchymal stem cells via regulating the phosphorylation of mTOR. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114(1):79–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  311. Herberg S, et al. Stromal cell-derived factor-1β mediates cell survival through enhancing autophagy in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e58207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  312. Phadwal K, Watson AS, Simon AK. Tightrope act: autophagy in stem cell renewal, differentiation, proliferation, and aging. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(1):89–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  313. Ugland H, et al. cAMP induces autophagy via a novel pathway involving ERK, cyclin E and beclin 1. Autophagy. 2011;7(10):1199–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  314. Xia Y, et al. Small extracellular vesicles secreted by human iPSC-derived MSC enhance angiogenesis through inhibiting STAT3-dependent autophagy in ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  315. Yu G, et al. Apoptotic bodies derived from Fibroblast-Like cells in Subcutaneous Connective tissue inhibit ferroptosis in ischaemic flaps via the miR-339-5p/KEAP1/Nrf2 Axis. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(24):e2307238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  316. Wang Y, et al. Delivering antisense oligonucleotides across the blood-brain barrier by Tumor Cell-Derived Small apoptotic bodies. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(13):2004929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  317. Li B, et al. Intracellular transport is accelerated in early apoptotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(48):12118–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  318. Albeck JG, et al. Modeling a snap-action, variable-delay switch controlling extrinsic cell death. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(12):2831–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  319. Cao Z, et al. Encapsulation of Nano-Bortezomib in apoptotic stem cell-derived vesicles for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Small. 2023;19(40):e2301748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  320. Bose RJC, et al. Reconstructed apoptotic bodies as targeted Nano decoys to treat intracellular bacterial infections within macrophages and Cancer cells. ACS Nano. 2020;14(5):5818–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  321. Kranich J, et al. In vivo identification of apoptotic and extracellular vesicle-bound live cells using image-based deep learning. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9(1):1792683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  322. Dou G, et al. Chimeric apoptotic bodies functionalized with natural membrane and modular delivery system for inflammation modulation. Sci Adv. 2020;6(30):eaba2987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  323. Zheng L, et al. Vivo Monocyte/Macrophage-Hitchhiked Intratumoral Accumulation of Nanomedicines for enhanced tumor therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(1):382–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  324. Bao L, et al. Engineered neutrophil apoptotic bodies ameliorate myocardial infarction by promoting macrophage efferocytosis and inflammation resolution. Bioact Mater. 2022;9:183–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  325. Hoseinzadeh A, et al. Dysregulated balance in Th17/Treg axis of pristane-induced lupus mouse model, are mesenchymal stem cells therapeutic? Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;117:109699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  326. Weiss DJ, et al. The necrobiology of mesenchymal stromal cells affects therapeutic efficacy. Frontiers in Immunology; 2019. p. 10.

  327. Filho DM, et al. Enhancing the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells with the CRISPR-Cas System. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2019;15(4):463–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Akram Hoseinzadeh, Rasoul Baharlou, and Mahmoud Mahmoudi designed and drafted the manuscript. Akram Hoseinzadeh, Seyed-Alireza Esmaeili, Reza Sahebi, Anahita Madani Melak, Mahmoud Mahmoudi, Maliheh Hasannia, and Rasoul Baharlou participated in manuscript writing. Akram Hoseinzadeh has drawn the Figures. All authors have fully read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasoul Baharlou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Artificial intelligence (AI)

The authors declare that they have not use AI-generated work in this manuscript.

Author agreement

This manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, and all authors listed on the manuscript have agreed to its submission.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoseinzadeh, A., Esmaeili, SA., Sahebi, R. et al. Fate and long-lasting therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stromal/stem-like cells: mechanistic insights. Stem Cell Res Ther 16, 33 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13287-025-04158-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13287-025-04158-z

Keywords